Just remember Who's bombs rain down on the Palestinian People day and night . Who's troops backed by the US and Britain kick in the doors of Palestinian homes , day and night .
Maybe that will answer your question . If not, how about the fact that the blair bush project wish to rule the whole of the middle east .
Yours
JW Dread
2007-02-20 02:27:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by JW Dread 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
The most important thing to bear in mind is that there is no such place in the world as Palestine. Except for a city in Texas.
The actual word "Palestine" came from the Romans, not the Arabs, and there has never been an independent country or state of Palestine, nor a Palestinian rule. Yet we are led to believe that there are Palestinians and then there are Arabs.
In August 11, 1919 in a memorandum to Lord Curzon, Lord Balfour stated that "whatever be the future of Palestine, it is not now an 'independent nation,' nor is it yet on the way to becoming one". Professor of history Reverend James Parkes wrote in Whose Land that "before 1914, ... the mass of the population [in Palestine] had no real feeling of belonging to any wider unit than their village, clan or possibly confederation of clans". He stressed the point that "up to that time it is not possible to speak of the existence of any general sentiment of nationality".
There is no language known as Palestinian. There is no distinct Palestinian culture. There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs, indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent invention), Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc. Keep in mind that the Arabs control 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands. Israel represents one-tenth of 1 percent of the landmass.
As long as the Arabs refuse to accept a Jewish state in the Middle East, the conflict will remain unresolved. Israel must completely and totally defeat the Arabs, so that a peace treaty can be signed and enforced.
2007-02-20 03:45:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
The determination grow to be no longer authorized, and could no longer be enforced through fact the section grow to be decrease than British rule. The UN is barred via its shape from partaking interior the affairs of sovereign international locations except it relatively is invited to accomplish that, or the protection Council votes that (as an occasion) 'genocide' is occurring, that's why it might desire to no longer 'intervene' in Serbia, Rwanda etc. With the votes of the everlasting individuals required to enforce this style of determination that's going to fail (e.g. involvement in Serbia grow to be vetoed via Russia) Following Jewish terrorism Britain introduced it grow to be taking flight from the section. The day earlier they have been through withdraw the Jewish community unilaterally reported that it grow to be now the state of Israel. This grow to be on the instant regarded via the u . s ., and the united kingdom and different international locations without postpone accompanied suit. in spite of the reality that the Arab international locations have been better in quantity, among the Jewish forces have been many that were conflict-hardened for the duration of WWII. This, plus greater modern weaponry, ensured a Jewish victory. Non-Jewish citizens have been forced out of their ancestral residences the two via gunpoint or as subsequently of fears of being caught up interior right here conflict.
2016-10-16 02:13:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Palestinians refuse to accept the UN resolutions which legitimised the state of Israel, so why should Israel accept the UN resolutions regarding Palestine. The UN has not, and will not protect Israel when it is invaded, nor does it even protest when hezbollah(Iranian army) deliberately targets civilians with rockets and suicide bombers. Israel owes the UN nothing
2007-02-20 09:00:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by mick t 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
As long as Arabs do not have a significant influence that may really affect the selection of governors, parliament members, and presidents, they are allowed nothing.... When their votes weigh more, and when they are well represented in the government and political parties, and when their business in the States starts to be influential, eyes will blink in acceptance instead of blinking guns.
Something else, Arabs have a communication problem, they do not use the correct language or attitude as skilfully as Israel; so they cannot justify what they do in a way that allows acceptance or even negligence ....
2007-02-20 00:26:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dr. Tamer Lokman 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Are you mad?
Do you really believe the anti-Jewish garbage you are stating?
Israel is the only Jewish state in the whole world. The Arabs have 22 states. The Arabs are not wiling to accept a Jewish state in their midst.
Israel thought that by leaving Gaza entirely in August 2005, that the Arabs would get their act together and develop their economy. Instead, the Arab have seen fit to launch thousands of missiles at Israel's civilian population, intending to kill as many citizens as possible.
Israel, on the other hand, is trying to live in peace. When they do attack, it is with the clear objective of silencing the Arab terrorists. By international law, Israel is totally justified in its quest to protect its citizens. The Arabs are in total violation of international law by unprovoked attacking of innocent civilians in Israel.
The Palestinian Arabs could have had a state already, if they only behaved like civilized human beings. But they have proven time and again that they are not ready to behave, and so the Arabs will have to exist with "only" 22 states.
2007-02-20 03:34:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Israel is strong, many other countries are week. The same thing happens in the west, America breaks lots of rules and so do the UK, It is all based on hypocrisy and the UN will fade out in the not too distant future!
2007-02-20 01:02:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aled H 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because Israel will not recruit children or extremists to kill everyone who doesn't convert to Judaism. They aren't cowards. The only thing I wonder about with Israel, is why they put up with all of the Islam rhetoric. Why they didn't throw Islam out of their country decades ago, and why are they so compassionate with people who are clearly bigots. The only answer I can think of is that they serve the loving, forgiving compassionate God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, and not some war monger false god.
2007-02-20 00:30:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by John in AZ 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I am glad the Israeli ignores the UN,we all should.The UN is gutless anti-Israel,anti-America organization and mostly sides with thugs and dictators from around the world.The only way the UN's sanctions are ever enforced, is when the USA does it for them,and then the UN is not happy,because we actually did something,instead of sitting around (for years sometimes) and talking about the problem.
2007-02-20 00:30:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by roysbigtoys 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
I don't like Israel either.
Their leaders spend too much time talking to that famous wall
I've heard of the saying
'its like talking to a brick wall'
I didn't actually think people done it !!!
2007-02-20 01:40:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by speedball182 3
·
0⤊
2⤋