http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070219/ap_on_re_eu/britain_prince_to_iraq
Prince Harry according to this article is trying to get deployed. I agree if a leader wants to bring a nation to war, he should go to war. So the question is, would you be more for the war if Bush decided to lead on the ground and put his life on the line then on a comfy couch in the white house?
2007-02-19 22:18:13 · 11 answers · asked by gotagetaweigh 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
What nation is Prince Harry a leader of ?
I didn't see you asking if Blair should go.
I didn't see you asking if Prince Williams should go, hes the Prince actually in line to be King.
We have a President to Lead the Nation, not to do foot patrols.
Now if you wanna say should the President have to have served in the Military, that's a valid question.
Just don't ask the Democrats that, since none of their candidates have.
2007-02-19 22:32:59 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since when was Prince Harry a leader? Ask again when he becomes one. President Bush, even though a leader, doesn't spend his days sitting on a "comfy couch" by any means.
2007-02-20 00:30:50 · answer #2 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"life on the line"!? do you know what the life expectancy of an american paratrooper dropped into a combat situation in vietnam was? 16 seconds. think about that.60,000 men were killed in one afternoon in wwII at the battle of the somme.there is no front lines.the front lines have been incinerated by rockets and straphing long before the infantry even show up.its urban gorilla warfare now.id be more impressed it he'd walk alone to 7-11 at 2am downtown LA.
2007-02-19 22:31:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not really, but he wants to fight he should be there - he might the understand the hell ( and fog ) of war a bit better - and think a bit more before sending troops into extreme danger
2007-02-19 22:36:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He needs to bypass. the subject is that he could be a brilliant purpose for insurgents and that could positioned the lives of his comrades in his squad in jeopardy. there is not any reason to have those inocent youthful adult adult males positioned into exponetionaly extra effective threat by using fact they are with the third in line to rule Britian.
2016-09-29 09:00:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, all Presidents should have served time in the military. How can you lead when you have no experience.
2007-02-19 22:39:36 · answer #6 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-02-19 22:25:35 · answer #7 · answered by livlafluv 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mr. Bush had his chance, and was too Druged Up to show up for His Physical. I MIGHT think a 'Tic' more for him if he sent his "Two Daughters" (how long would this war last if that happened)
2007-02-20 00:59:07 · answer #8 · answered by bodie 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if only the queen had not insisted of calling off the troops.
2007-02-20 14:16:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably, but it will never happen; because he knows pretty well that he can't sacrifice his good self if he can do with others' children.
All the best!/
2007-02-19 22:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋