2007-02-19 21:09:04 · 7 answers · asked by trumps 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hague.
2007-02-19 21:11:32 · answer #1 · answered by Frisky 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Brown not in it for the power?
Don't make me laugh. Actually, carry on, I could do with a jester.
Brown is notorious for being a complete control freak in the Treasury. Him in Number 10 will be a nightmare. He'll be worse than Blair for wanting to micromanage absolutely everything.
As for Cameron? Has he come up with any policies yet?
I agree with the first answer here: Hague.
2007-02-20 06:28:51 · answer #2 · answered by Morgy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brown
2007-02-20 05:26:18 · answer #3 · answered by Antman 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
None because they are all out to serve them selves and not their country
But a change is as good as a rest Cameron
he couldn't do any worse.
2007-02-20 05:29:09 · answer #4 · answered by sylvie c 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't like either of them but almost anyone is preferable to Brown.
2007-02-20 06:28:41 · answer #5 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Brown, definitely, though I thoroughly dislike and disapprove of most of his colleagues.
Brown is a genuine, sincere man. He may not get it right all the time, and he can be edgy and difficult.
But I think he is in politics to make a difference, rather than for personal aggrandisement and power like most of them.
He lives a relatively normal lifestyle, doesn't take flash holidays, works hard and does his best.
And his wife is a lovely woman who concentrates on her kids and on charity work rather than swanning round trying to look important.
Brown every time for me. Even though I never vote Labour (due to the rest of them being appalling).
2007-02-20 05:18:59 · answer #6 · answered by mcfifi 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
maybe Boris Johnson would be better!
2007-02-20 07:43:47 · answer #7 · answered by Drop the donkey 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋