English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

"W" was not elected the first time he ran - he was "selected". The way the whole presidential election - voting problems - "hanging chads" and many other "anomalies" that occurred during that election were horrendous to "let" them happen. I believe their was a tremendous amount of fraud committed by many "officials" in the electoral process in the 2000 election. Most of which was covered up. And then during the 2004 election the people who did vote for him had to be"out of their minds". This country has started going downhill faster and faster under his "dictatorship" - sorry I mean mandate. Where is a Lee Harvey Oswald now when we really could have used him - not only to get rid the president - but also the vice-president.?

No - he should never have been selected the first time nor elected the second time. He has only caused the USA to be hated even more and even worse he has caused much destruction in different parts of the world. Which country will he decide next has weapons of mass destruction? The ones where oil is abundant or just discovered - or the ones where more diamond mines or gold mines have been discovered - or just wherever he and his cronies can make a killing of "mass profits" through the reconstruction efforts of the destruction and killing they have caused?

2007-02-19 21:00:03 · answer #1 · answered by lobita8 1 · 0 3

I'M glad Bush was elected, and yes he was elected both times. The first election was almost stolen by the liberal media for Al Gore. Has anyone ever heard of jumping on the band wagon? The only reason Gore won the popular vote was because the media intentionally called the election early for him trying to sway the election. When they called Florida for him there were still people in the panhandle standing in line to vote. Most Bush supporters that heard the news simply walked away thinking whats the use. Then you take into consideration the West Coast. They had heard to that Gore had won so you had people that wanted to vote for a winner, so they vote for Gore. You also had people who supported Bush once again give up and go home. Gore barely won the popular vote. Do the math!! Had the liberal media not lied it is highly likely that Bush would have won the popular vote too, possibly by a couple of million votes. Its is also a virtual certainty that if Gore were president we would have been attack again after 9/11, possibly several times before he woke up, that's assuming he even would have. And Kerry, who wants and anti-American president? I know I don't.

2007-02-19 21:30:28 · answer #2 · answered by Jayson Kane 7 · 1 2

The problem her is not Bush getting elected. The problem is why can't the Dems put someone up for election that actually has a plan and not changed their mind half a dozen times.

The election is won by electoral votes, and he won them the last two times. What does that say for the Dems? (this is when the Libs say he stole it) Why don't the Dems simply look at reality and get a real person to run for office that can stick to his guns? Look how fast the Dems cut Lieberman from the party, but who won in his district?

MicMac- You can't say that. When your commander and cheat cut the military in half, vets could no longer receive services at the military post hospitals. that was a benefit that was held sacred by entire communities.

2007-02-19 21:05:08 · answer #3 · answered by El P 3 · 1 1

First, bill Clinton became into impeached because of the fact he dedicated against the regulation. Perjury, subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice, in case you think any reporting on the Scooter Libby case, are crimes. 2d, we don't blame Clinton for the economic device. For the main section for the final 7 years, the economic device has been doing super. there have been wallet the place the economic device has been incredibly undesirable, the rust belt particularly, yet, in all honesty, that became into occurring in the past Bush or maybe Clinton have been given into workplace. while Clinton became into in workplace, the economic device the place I used to stay became into no longer something to gloat approximately the two. The grimy little key is this; no president, no count what occasion he/she belongs to, has that lots to do with the economic device being sturdy or undesirable. Congress has greater to do with it. Congress passes the spending expenditures. Congress writes the budgets (usually loaded with earmarks for puppy initiatives). Congress gadgets tax rules. Congress gadgets commerce tarrifs/subsidies. jointly as the president finally signs and indications the expenditures, look into his concepts. If he vetoes the expenditures, he damaging aspects shutting down the government. If he signs and indications the expenditures, he facilitates the gross overspending of the peoples money. so which you notice, Congress may be the only's that would get the blame or credit, no longer the president.

2016-11-24 19:45:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush was selected by 5 activist judges in 2000 thanks to the hanging chad and election officials in the state of Florida.

In 2004 the GOP and Karl Rove used the fear and terrorism to scare the America public to vote for Bush and usual dirty tricks of the GOP in the election.

2007-02-20 04:15:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Veternas benefits have increased under every administration. Not just cause Bush is in office!

And I voted for Gore and than for Kerry, so I do believe that Bush should never had been elected. Thank-you

2007-02-19 21:07:48 · answer #6 · answered by micmac_9 4 · 0 3

im from greece.....personaly i think G.bush needs to be thrown out or maybe even assasinated, all countries around our side of the world are suffering because of what U.s.a are doing.....(G.bush represents u.s.a.) his causeing world distruction with out the states being aware.....his not just effecting the desert countries but his also effecting everything surrounding......3 months ago Cypriots discovered that the island Cyprus has underground Oil......lets sit back and see what G.bush will come up with.....cypriot people might just become U.S.A next terrorists or racists or what ever he hasnt used.....i know one Bin laden is Greek so that means greeks and cypiots must die....and USA cheers for there president G.bush until they start loosing there family brothers and fathers at war......and there president turns to the world LIVE on camera to say "they did what was right....for there family, for us, for the united states of america" which is the only countrie in the world that doesnt live half the poverty the rest of the world do.........You who are American citizens make the diffrence vote G.bush Out.

2007-02-19 20:57:48 · answer #7 · answered by voniates1st 1 · 0 3

sure he should have and was....why dont ya'll get over this..he is gone in less than 2 years...he cant do anything else..the new congress wont let him and if they do,its their fault,so you can beat up on them......Fla was 6 years ago...geeze people...move on cant you....you remind me of the stories of Bonnie Prince Charlie hiding in exile in France after Culloden plotting to retake what was rightfully his for 20 years...with maybe 3 followers listening to him.....get over it...

2007-02-19 20:47:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He paid for the office didn't he?

Get rid of the oil hungry bastard

2007-02-19 21:11:58 · answer #9 · answered by Aussie1 2 · 0 2

So many!

2007-02-19 20:43:31 · answer #10 · answered by xazuru 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers