2007-02-19
20:16:45
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
gandamac When did a plane hit WTC 7?
You mean that there was another plane that noone else knew about but you?
2007-02-19
20:24:27 ·
update #1
Oh yeah then why did United Airlines spend 36 million dollars three years ago to equip their 1st class passengers with cell phone capacity if it already was possible?
2007-02-19
20:26:49 ·
update #2
Rich you usually make good points but here you couldn't be more miss informed or maybe just full of Sh!t. Evryone watchin TV that day saw WTC 7 fall after the twin towers.
And you down below him just because you hate someone who has bilked your beloved country out of billions and has cost thousands of our finest young men and womens lives doesn't mean you hate America, but perhaps if you are a proponant of such an individual that could be said about you.
2007-02-19
20:31:53 ·
update #3
Rich I apoligize for the full of sh!t comment, I wanted to do it publicly because you are right I should not have said that. You are grossly miss informed on the matter of WTC 7 for it did comee down in one qick rush within an hour of the twin towers collaps and everyone who was watching saw it. I am sorry for my rudeness.
2007-02-19
21:44:26 ·
update #4
http://gprime.net/flash.php/911pentagonstrikeconspiracy#Main
Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year Air Force career.
Essay: "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." http://www.physics911.net
Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project. 30-year Army career.
Article 8/19/05: Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile." http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf
Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force – Former Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Commercial pilot for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years, flying 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777 ’s. Had previously flown the actual two United Airlines airplanes that were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC).
Article 7/17/05: "The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple." … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have "descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 270 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon's first floor wall without touching the lawn."…
"For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible - there is not one chance in a thousand," said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727's to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737's through 767's it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying." http://www.arcticbeacon.com
Audio Interview 9/16/04: Regarding Flight 77, which allegedly hit the Pentagon. "The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall. The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous...
It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building. There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile." http://911underground.com
2007-02-19 20:25:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by dstr 6
·
3⤊
5⤋
RICH..."Believe me, fully-fueled passenger jets make unbelievable explosives with 2000 degree heat. I lived in NY in 9-11."
The whole world saw the damage that was done to the towers after the crash, This is not a matter of conjecture. The whole world also saw the collapse of building 7, with controllable fires burning through the lower floors.
In Spain a building with similar constructs as the WTC buildings burned for 30 hours and that building never, ever, came down.
As I am sure you have travelled on a plane, you would know that it is not possible to use cell phones in the air, but ironically, those on flight 93 were able to do this. I don't claim to have the answers of what happened on the tragic day of 9/11, but one thing I am sure about is that it was never as was explained to us.
I just wish people like yourself would just forget the patriotic thing for once and just look objecively at what happened, what you were told and try to reach a conclusion based on what as laymen you and I would expect to have happened and what happened.
I too by the way had visited ground zero and Mayor Giuliani has a lot of questions to answer. Maybe he will be challenged about them during this long '08 campaign.
2007-02-19 22:16:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
UA Flight 93 target was the US Capitol or the White House. The rest of your theory is false.
2016-03-29 03:58:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What brought WTC 7? The oil storage reserve in the basement caught fire.
The cell phone issue is a wonder. 6 years later with superior technology, I cant get freaking reception in downtown Minneapolis, let alone at 400 MPH a mile in the sky.
2007-02-19 21:28:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
WTC 7: Debris from the other towers.
Pentagon: A plane
Cell phones from planes: Sprint, Verizon, Cingular cell coverage
A note. Your arguments sound like something from a 12 year old.
If you are really interested in "learning" why the Towers collapsed, and how things happen, get educated. You need to go to school learn about physics, metallurgy and chemistry.
2007-02-19 21:50:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Let's put this baby to rest once and for all. Your question, in 3 parts, is utterly boring me to tears. There was no conspiracy, if that's your point. WTC-7 was not steady enough for reconstruction so they tore it down. A jet hit the Pentagon. It wasn't a missile, a bomb, or Bush wasn't seen hiding across the highway, under the underpass with any explosive charges. Also, the last part---in this day and age, it is possible to make cell phone calls from jetliners. There is no "miracle" to it. It was not a fabrication of the truth. I hope this will put your weary head to rest.
2007-02-19 20:26:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by gone 6
·
8⤊
5⤋
WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition. The pentagon was hit by a missile, because there is no way a plane could have made a 16 foot hole, and left no debris on the outside. And, those cell phone calls were faked, and we are not kooks!!!!
2007-02-19 22:32:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Welcome back to the present time. While you were out, there were two commercial airliners that struck the WTC, one into each tower. There was another commercial airliner that was flown into the Pentagon. And Cell phones can work, most planes have phones in them as well.
2007-02-19 20:29:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by El P 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
All of these questions came from Loose Change which tries to prove that Americans and not terrorists would kill 3,000 innocent people. Any American who would buy that concept is sick and your commenting to everyone who answers this question is annoying and rude. Just pick a favorite and shut up until you do.
2007-02-19 23:14:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Debra D 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
I watched a few of the documentaries about this and they almost had me convinced but then I watched conspiracy files on BBC 2 on sunday and it answered alot of the questions.
If you wanted to watch it im sure you could on the BBC website if you search for it.
2007-02-19 20:32:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋