Despite the clear import of the matter, the U.S. Congress has decided not to empanel a Joint Committee of the House and of the Senate with subpoena power giving them access to whatever hard evidence they want throughout any agency of the United States government -- including the National Security Council, FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA -- and also to put their Officials under oath to testify as to what happened and why under penalty of perjury. Obviously a cover-up is underway for the express purpose of not determining (1) who was ultimately responsible for the terrible attacks of 11 September 2001; and (2) why these extravagantly funded U.S. "intelligence" agencies were either unable or unwilling to prevent these attacks despite numerous warnings of a serious anti-American attack throughout the Summer of 2001 -- and yet, amazingly, could assert the identity of those responsible with such certainty in the space of hours thereafter as to preclude any serious investigation of other possible perpetrators. And for reasons not necessary to get into here, there is also an ongoing governmental cover-up of the obvious involvement of the Pentagon/CIA, or one of their contractors, in the anthrax attack upon the American People and all three Branches of the U.S. Federal Government.
The `Islamic Brigades' are a creation of the CIA. In standard CIA jargon, Al Qaeda is categorized as an `intelligence asset'. Support to terrorist organizations is an integral part of U.S. foreign policy. Al Qaeda continues to this date (2002) to participate in CIA covert operations in different parts of the World. These `CIA-Osama links' do not belong to a bygone era, as suggested by the mainstream media.
"The U.S. Congress has documented in detail, the links of Al Qaeda to agencies of the U.S. government during the civil war in Bosnia-Herzegovina, as well as in Kosovo.More recently in Macedonia, barely a few months before September 11, U.S. military advisers were mingling with Mujahideen mercenaries financed by Al Qaeda. Both groups were fighting under the auspices of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), within the same terrorist paramilitary formation.
"The CIA keeps track of its `intelligence assets'. Amply documented, Osama bin Laden's whereabouts were always known. Al Qaeda is infiltrated by the CIA. In other words, there were no `intelligence failures'! In the nature of a well-led intelligence operation, the `intelligence asset' operates (wittingly or unwittingly) with some degree of autonomy, in relation to its U.S. government sponsors, but ultimately it acts consistently, in the interests of Uncle Sam.
"While individual FBI agents are often unaware of the CIA's role, the relationship between the CIA and Al Qaeda is known at the top levels of the FBI. Members of the Bush Administration and the U.S. Congress are fully cognizant of these links.
"The foreknowledge issue focusing on `FBI lapses' is an obvious smokescreen. While the whistleblowers serve to underscore the weaknesses of the FBI, the role of successive U.S. administrations (since the presidency of Jimmy Carter) in support of the `Islamic Militant Base', is simply not mentioned.
2007-02-19 20:01:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by dstr 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
They do care about the possibility of winning, as that would be the worst thing for them.
Winning would mean that they would have to bring the troops home now...... no more $ for Halliburton & their other affiliated war profiteering companies, and less of an opportunity to attack Iran and Syria and the entire rest of the Middle East.
Their goal is to destabilize all of the ME nations so that they can prop up American puppets who will do America's and Israel's bidding.
So how will they accomplish this goal? Why keep up the charade of a "war on terror" of course. They plant road side bombs, and blame it on "insurgents" connected to Iran. However, if you look at the pictures of the bombs supposedly manufactured on Iran, you will see that they are stamped in English and have the date 2006. The problem here is that Iran is not an English speaking country and they don't use the Christian calender. According to their calender, it's the 1300's.
Bush is a dumb a s s lying sack off sh!t, surrounded by other dumb a s s lying sacks off sh!t. And they all assume everyone is as dumb as they are.
.........................
2007-02-19 20:17:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Iraq had WMD up till months in the previous the invasion. Russia helped circulate them to Syria. it incredibly is actuality reported via the regularly occurring al Tikriti. it relatively is not shown via the US government simply by fact of two motives. relatives with Russia are extra desirable than ever staggering now, regardless of the help they giave to Saddam. W would not choose for to destroy that. clever circulate in the pastime staggering now. the 2nd reason is that politically it relatively is extra desirable to coach evidence close to election time so the Republicans can look after the Whitehouse. additionally had to proceed powerful efforts in battleing the terrorists. replaced into greed in contact? specific. of direction. little question. maximum each and every thing that the human does is a minimum of partly inspired via greed. I not often see all people volunteer for charity projects except they might by some potential income, the two financially or with acceptance.
2016-10-02 10:41:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Couldnt care less? Heck, they cant even define victory! There is no such thing as victory in Iraq. How do you win someone else's civil war? For that matter, how do you win the war on terror?
2007-02-19 21:19:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush put it so clearly in his press conference on February 14, 2007 - "Money trumps peace."
2007-02-19 23:11:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by rtistathrt 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
America has woke up to these facts with a 28% approval rating only the severly mentally impared are still supporting the war or the administration.
2007-02-19 20:02:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Their brains had turned into hard shits. They wouldnt accept, eventhough Bush & Cheney admitted it themselves!
2007-02-19 22:01:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They are in survival mode and must preserve their legacies. Bush & Cheney will be terminated from their employment positions in 2009. Until then, we have to live with it.
2007-02-19 20:33:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by gone 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
bush let us into this war and now he has to see how to make things right but if you take a closer look at the situation in iraq right now you should realize it would be the worst thing to do to call all troops home now.
2007-02-19 20:23:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
you are obviously clueless given the idiocy of your question!!!!!!
Winning the war in Iraq is in this country's best interests. Terrorists will NOT go away so we are better off fighting them there than here. why is this so damned difficult to grasp?????
2007-02-20 00:55:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋