thanx for dropping your answers. if possible, i need more statements with strong evidences as these points will be included in my debate points. a huge bunch of thanks to all of you!
2007-02-19 18:48:10 · 5 answers · asked by ovie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
This may not be necessarily a good idea. I think countries that have similar culture to that of the refugees should accept more of them. However, the affluent nations should help these other nations sustain the refugee population via a UN refugee fund.
2007-02-19 18:58:05 · answer #1 · answered by Muga Wa Kabbz 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Affluent nations should accept more refugees because they have the money to sustain the need of refugees and give them job opportunities in order to have a good standard of living.
2007-02-20 02:52:22 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should. Refugees will have a much better chance of overcoming the circumstances of their lives if given the chance to go to a more prosperous country.
2007-02-22 15:58:08 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Multi-culturalism helps to foster a greater understanding of differing communities within one's country without ever having to visit foreign lands. Sufficient rehabilitation of refugees however would need to be undertaken to help them through the process of loss (which they would have probably suffered) and integration within a new community.
2007-02-20 03:17:56 · answer #4 · answered by pokeahounddog 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read all of the following site and you will have more than enough info for your debate.
http://www.overpopulation.org/whyPopMatters.html
2007-02-20 03:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by Scully 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋