I would say chicago would have won 4-1 or 4-2
2007-02-19 17:04:07 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
This is hilarious. The bulls would dominate. It would be a 4-0 shutout.
2007-02-19 18:57:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Lakers fan but I think the Bulls 3peat team had an edge, Kobe and Jordan both had that killer instinct to make the huge shot down the stretch.but I give Jordan the edge at the time of the championships because Kobe was still very young. Obviously Shaq dominated at center and carried a lot of the Lakers scoring load but the bulls passed the ball better and had {Pippen and Kucoc scoring , I think the biggest difference was the rebounding and defense of Rodman People don't mention him that much but he was often grabbing 18-20 boards. I think the showtime Laker teams Kareem, Worthy, Magic, Rambis, Byron Scott were better than either of those teams though
2007-02-19 17:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by scorer 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lakers actually have 2 3-peats, from 1954-1956 in Minneapolis, and 2000-2002 in la. The Boston Celtics have an 8-peat from 1959-1966, and so that they gained in 1957, 1968, and 1969, so that they were 2 championships faraway from an 11-peat.
2016-12-04 09:58:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good Question. The bulls team did go 72-10 in the regular season, and the lakers went 15-1 in the playoffs. The Lakers had Shaq, Horry, Fox, Kobe, Fisher in a stacked Western Conference. The Bulls had Longley, Rodman, Pippen, Jordan, Harper. Both teams had plenty of fire power, but the edge has to go to the bulls because they were better defensively, and had a better supporting cast (6th man Kukoc).
2007-02-19 17:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by thecrock_00 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is a tough one to answer. I definitely say it would be a 7 game classic and it could go either way. If I had to choose I'd go with the Lakers. MJ would have a slight edge on Kobe but Shaq would dominate Longley/Wennington.
2007-02-19 17:24:36 · answer #5 · answered by POLITICALLY INCORRECT ASSHOLE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very good question. Shaq in the middle vs. Jordan in his prime. I say the Bulls 4-3. Bulls had the more complete team.
2007-02-19 17:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
c'mon it's no doubt the bulls will win 4 games to 1, there's a year when like the lakers took it to game seven against the kings or something to make it to the finals but the bulls made it to the finals with ease, so would say it's the bulls it's like battling with the GOD(MJ)
2007-02-20 00:46:29 · answer #7 · answered by melo15 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to go with the Bulls. They had a better supporting staff than Kobe and Shaq did and they had MJ. Tough to beat.
2007-02-20 01:57:39 · answer #8 · answered by awesomeo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bulls. They were unstopable. MJ could out run, out shoot, out anything any team by himself. But with his teamates, that line up was huge.
Sorry to say, but I think that Kobe and Shaquille both are overrated.
2007-02-19 17:18:29 · answer #9 · answered by MoMoney23 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a tough one but i would have to say the Bulls...b/c no one could stop Jordan...he made everyone around him great!!!
2007-02-19 17:10:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋