2007-02-19 15:14:35 · 5 answers · asked by answer man 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Ernst Zundel was exercising his freedom of speech a basic human right. Rosa Parks was exercising her right to sit in the front of the bus.
2007-02-19 16:29:07 · update #1
Exactly what is your point,that we equate Rosa Parks with a Holocaust Denier?Or that German law should apply to a United States citizen.Rosa Parks broke an immoral law.Ernst Zundel practices about the most insidious form of racism I,ve ever seen-using junk science to"prove"the most well documented act of genocide in history didn't happen.
2007-02-19 16:12:22 · answer #1 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
despite the fact that she did harm the regulation, there's a distinction. Rosa Parks did no longer poop in the front seat of the bus or rape the bus driving force. She complete an act of civil disobedience, no longer senseless violence or crime. and you misspelled "save on with", chief.
2016-11-24 19:25:41 · answer #2 · answered by giniebra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter. She was with-in the Federal law, which always supercedes State's laws.
2007-02-19 15:37:22 · answer #3 · answered by greg j. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am pretty sure she did and decided that the consciences were worth it.
2007-02-19 15:18:05 · answer #4 · answered by Petra 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course she did - she was practicing civil disobedience.
2007-02-19 15:17:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anne 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋