2007-02-19 15:03:23 · 21 answers · asked by gggg 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Would have saved a lot of coalition lives. Regardless of the outcome it would of made thousands of people happy.
2007-02-19 15:07:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so only because a duel wouldn't last long enough . A match in the octagon would be best if it were a no holds barred match . It should have been a total submission match , only stopping when one guy said uncle Saddam or uncle George . The whole world would pay a hundred a head to watch that , I know I would have.
2007-02-19 16:13:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
heell ya,,,,what a thought,,,decider like...classic weapons and no side steeping from Hussein,give bush a one shot advantage,,,,after all Saddam has no honor.also give bush a shotgun,lets be real ,just let bush shot Saddam with a fricken machine gun say a 45 cat Thomson like the gangsters used,point blank turn Saddam into a melon,,,on free TV ,no pay per view...now that sounds safe and right,,,two bad he just got the neck break. decider
2007-02-19 15:27:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a brutal, ill dictator that makes Saddam look like an absolute shaggy dog tale. Bush is likewise a mass assassin and traitor to the US. Bush is via some distance the main hated and feared guy in historic previous, sweeping Hitler via tens of millions of votes.
2016-10-16 01:41:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What good would that have done? If Bush won, Hussein's place would just be filled by another wacko. If Saddam won, Iraq would still have a wacko in power anyway. Besides, how can you base the fate of millions on the outcome of something that could very easily rest on sheer dumb luck?
2007-02-19 15:11:28 · answer #5 · answered by Richard S 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That event should have taken place.Pay per view charges world wide would be in the trillions. It could have single handily brought the usa out of debt.
2007-02-19 15:18:31 · answer #6 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They did GWs war machine was mightier the Saddams saber.
2007-02-19 15:17:42 · answer #7 · answered by Mother 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In order for that to work Bush would have had to have been trained to remove the sward from the holster.
2007-02-19 15:17:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, in a locked room with hand grenades at 3 paces.
2007-02-19 15:14:26 · answer #9 · answered by chimpus_incompetus 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes.This would have given us the chance to elect a new president or given us a better chance in Iraq.
2007-02-19 15:09:47 · answer #10 · answered by Scuba 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋