English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will she respond or ask us to remain calm and understanding.
Offer them say california or hawaii to stop the attacks.
Will she cut spending so bad that there will not be a military to respond to defend our borders our cities and town from internal attacks.

2007-02-19 14:57:09 · 24 answers · asked by Rick D 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

You closed minded liberals, I am not bashing the ability of a woman to be president, just hillary. Do you really trust her why. We were attacked how many times under clit and carter, what was that
a mirage.. There are far better women and no not pelosi and her crooked ways far left liberal hatred of American values.

You all sound like that Mayor on Red Dawn blind, gutless, but blind.

2007-02-19 15:44:56 · update #1

24 answers

Hillary isn't becoming president. She only appeals to the far, far left. And she annoys everybody. I've talked to some democrats I know and they say that they wouldn't vote for Hillary because she's just annoying. Hypothetically, if she becomes president, a terrorist attack is bound to happen and she'd try to handle it by negotioating with the terrorists. Ugh.

2007-02-19 15:00:40 · answer #1 · answered by glsbnewt21 3 · 4 6

Please tell me how many lies does it take for George Bush to relize he is losing the War in Iraq ? We found no WMD's and its time to send our troops home. Go Hillary, your dick is just afraid of a women being a president. Go Hillary or Obama. Nothing wrong with neither. Al Gore would have been a much better president. Iraq never attacked the United States. Don't Forget.

2007-02-19 15:00:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

Hillary Will Be One Of The Best Presidents We Will Ever Have!!!

Go Hillary....... and remember "Its the economy stupid!!!"

She will protect us from terrorist attack like a mother hen looking after her brood. I sure trust her and Bill way more than those oil money grubbing creeps in power now.

2007-02-19 15:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by Brandysmom 3 · 4 1

It worries me to read such uninformed fear-based nonsense from anyone. Bush has made the US a huge target by his stupid adventures in the middle east. If she gets to the white house, Hillary's more reasoned foreign policy will have a chance of reducing this clear and present republican generated danger.

2007-02-19 15:10:56 · answer #4 · answered by miketwemlow 3 · 2 1

he's a citizen of america. He can say something he needs as long as he does not sell the overthrow of our government. some could argue that he's making a tenet on the element of it yet in easy terms he might comprehend that. additionally, inspite of God whispering in his ear (soul) others could internet site that even predicting a substantial terrorist attack, consisting of after September, could be construed as a lead as much as a terrorist attack on his area. If we are all God's babies, i'm undecided you and that i've got been provided that comparable innovations. i comprehend I confident did no longer. I do exactly no longer desire him to place himself in one in all those gentle that others might evaluate him as a family contributors enemy of the state with the help of spreading pandemonium. something is conceivable no count number who says it. in case you or i'm going to have additionally stated it on national television on the comparable day as he did, does no longer we've in basic terms as lots of a raffle of having it suitable (or incorrect) as he is going too, if we are all equivalent under the regulation. Ed

2016-09-29 08:45:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

She voted for the war in Iraq, which distinguishes her from her two Democratic rivals in that (a) Barack Obama did not vote to authorize the invasion of Iraq and (b) John Edwards recanted his vote as a mistake.

As a U.S. Senator, she has made no move to cut spending, even to prevent the unpopular troop surge.

In summary, your argument is baseless.

2007-02-19 15:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 1 1

You're a big jerk. Have you no respect for women? What about your own mother? What is gender anyways? Something for a loser such as yourself to fixate upon? Get a life. This nation is in SERIOUS trouble and we don't need any more boneheaded white men screwing up this country's future.

2007-02-19 18:34:08 · answer #7 · answered by compaq presario 6 · 1 1

Is President Bush done reading "My Pet Goat," yet. When are we going to respond to the terrorists? We could of intercepted two of the hijacked planes but he was busy reading.

2007-02-19 15:22:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

About as long as it took for God to allow our incompetent current president to take the reigns and allow some of the most important institutions in our country to be attacked by airplanes.

Don't judge if you don't want to be judged right back....

2007-02-19 15:02:00 · answer #9 · answered by kohai4 2 · 4 1

Disturbing thoughts, those; all the more so because of their likelihood of truth. It will probably take more than a few hours, but the first terrorist attack will come once they feel we have softened up enough after our all-too-brief surge of unity after 9/11. Once that happens... Well, let's just say I'm not too optimistic that a full-scale world war will be prevented for very long.

2007-02-19 15:01:16 · answer #10 · answered by Richard S 5 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers