Do you know who Larry Silverstein is and that he owned the WTC?

Question

He has publicly stated that building 7 was "pulled".
Building 7 had fires that broke out around 11:30 am and by 5:30 pm they decided to "pull" (implode) the building.
Do you know how long it takes to place explosives strategically throughout a building so that it implodes straight down?
Its safe to say longer than 5 or 6 hours.
So when were the explosives put in place????

Here's the video check it out yourself

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

YES Clinton knew about the first bombings in the WTC!!!!
There are many people in this New World Order agenda!!!
Bush's people just are called the PNAC--Project for a New American Century now!!

http://newamericancentury.org
Go to the "Statement of Principals" section and scroll to the bottom there you will find people like Armitage, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Libby.......etc. Alot of people in Bush's administration!!!
This globalization includes many people from different countries in Europe as well as journalists and representatives from the Republican and Democrat parties!!!

Answer 1

That is why the Republican Congress wouldn't discuss this, and have an investigation. After Scooter Libby goes to prison, I believe Nancy Pelosi will have Bush and Cheney answering these questions. This will happen this summer.

Answer 2

Larry Silverstein owned one of the buildings. He was leasing the two towers from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. He had insured them a few weeks before they were destroyed. The towers were indeed destroyed by explosives, since that is the only way several inches of concrete dust could have been spread around several surrounding city blocks. It boggles the mind that some people can know this and NOT realize that the airplane collisions didn't collapse the towers and that, therefore, a conspiracy to demolish the buildings must have existed. The "Apollo moon landings were faked" conspiracy theory is whacky. But the "9/11 was an inside-job" conspiracy theory is sound.

Answer 3

Oh, there ya go....it wasn't this administration that was behind 9/11 it was Hillary. And don't forget that Larry is also a Jew. Maybe the Jews and Hillary were in on it together to discredit Bush. Does this sound as stupid to you as it does all the other conspirasists who insist that Bush was behind it?

Answer 4

Actually, he stated that he ordered the firefighters to be "pulled" from the building. It was severely damaged at the ground floors and had burned for about 7 hours, was making ominous creaking noises and he decided he would not want to be responsible for the deaths of more firefighters.

If you take the time to look for a broader source of information, you will find photos showing the extreme damage done to the building on the side facing the collapsed Twin Towers.

On that day, we saw three severely damaged steel-frame buildings experience intense fires at the damage locations - and all failed. That is why they are constructed with lots of fireproof insulation on the steel beams in the first place. Fire is hazardous to their structural integrity even without prior structural damage.

Answer 5

It is pretty obvious from the context of that expression that by "pulling it" means the fire department department pulled out and stopped fighting the fire in order to avoid further loss of life fighting a fire they could not contain.

If the FDNY could not contain it, there must have been pretty massive fires going on in the building.

Answer 6

About 5-6 hours before it came down. If you are alluding to the WTC being rigged with explosives, what would be the point? If the purpose of crashing the building was death and destruction, I'm saying why bother with a planned demolition? Let the building fall all over the place in a explosion would have caused more damage.

Answer 7

You moron. By pulling it the they meant that the fires inside the building were out of control so they weren't going to needlessly risk firefighters lives so they pulled them all out. Since fires now raged out of control the building collapsed. Guess your tin foil hat kept that out of your mid huh?

Problem #1, Larry Silverstein is not a demolition contractor, neither was the fire department chief, so why should we assume they’d be using slang demolition terms?

Problem #2, Silverstein says "they made that decision to pull", for instance -- the Fire Department. If "pull" means "demolish", then he's saying the Fire Department may not have decided to bring the building down if they couldn't contain the fire, but because it was beyond them, they decided to blow it up. Does this make sense? Not in the slightest.

Problem #3, Silverstein is suggesting that the decision to demolish the building was optional. It might not have happened. Does this fit with the idea of a convenient insurance scam? No, not at all.

Problem #4, why would the Fire Department willingly agree to engage in a multi-million dollar insurance fraud?

Problem #5, and since when do Fire Departments blow up buildings anyway?

Problem #6, and if it's so obvious that WTC7 was demolished, then why are the insurance companies not suing Silverstein for fraud?

Problem #7, and why would Silverstein admit this on television?

Answer 8

Yes, I have seen several videos, and I also know that he took out a very large insurance policy on all the collapsed buildings!!! You asked a really good question, but most the answers you have been getting so far, leave much to be desired!!!! Sorry about the misunderstanding!!!!!

Answer 9

I thought he leased the building not owned it, didnt he lease it from New York? I know I read somewhere he made a bunch of insurance money on it though.

It seems to me that he is talking about pulling the firefighters out of there in the video, as thats who he is talking about.

Answer 10

Just weeks before 9/11, Mr. Silverstein took out a record insurance policy on the entire WTC complex. something like 8.5 billion dollars, which he collected on twice, claiming that each plane represented a separate incident. Also, in the months preceding the attacks, the twin towers went through several unplanned and unusual 'power downs' and periods of in-occupation.