2007-02-19 13:42:43 · 5 answers · asked by 22angelbaby22 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
or would it be considered life science
2007-02-19 13:50:10 · update #1
It would actually be considered Biochemistry or Molecular Biology. Which is Life Science and Physical Science mixed together. Biochemistry is the study of the chemical processes and transformations in living organisms and Molecular Biology is the study of biology at a molecular level. Otherwise is is the application of Chemistry to Biology.
2007-02-19 13:58:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We have an appendix. That is vestigial. And as embryos we have tails. They are vestigial. I think that looking at frequency of fossils can tell us about the success of an organism. If it is around for a long time, and a lot of them are found, then that could indicate a better reproductive success rate. I think DNA and physical similarities are very significant pieces of evidence. All of these things together can be used in a variety of sciences, not just evolutionary science. They can be used in phylogenetics, anatomy, physiology, ecology, etc. So learning about them can be fascinating even if you don't believe that evolution is a valid theory. I don't really care if you think that evolution is credible or not, but I think it is worthwhile to learn about these different things. They apply to many sciences and then when you have arguments against evolutionary theory they might make more sense.
2016-05-24 18:31:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not.
Study of DNA happens in biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, chemistry...
2007-02-19 13:52:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. Maybe because the D.N.A is in a cell
2007-02-19 13:46:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
maybe yes. probably also biochemistry.
2007-02-19 13:50:58 · answer #5 · answered by levitate15 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋