With Iran needing to suspend their uranium enrichment program in 2 days,Will Iran be Diplomatic and suspend it

Question

America and NATO are trying to be diplomatic. Will Iran just stick their thumb up their nose at NATO and US. And Will America as a whole realise Iran needs a good slapping because diplomacy just doesnt work well in the Middle East

A Good slapping means blowing up their nuclear assets.. US doesnt want to take Iran over just make them less of a nuclear threat. that is what its about You guys apparently now think we just want to take over everything, I see the United States is no longer the paper tiger at all HAHA

Answer 1

I doubt it. Iran's leader is a nutcase and will destroy the whole planet it given the chance. They don't fear sanctions, they only understand brute force. The UN is useless, so they know only the US (and a few true allies) will give them trouble.

If we have to take them on, since I'm sure the UN won't, I hope this time we don't have to fight a politically correct war like we've had to in Iraq. If it comes down to war, let's just bomb them and not put our people over there to fight.

(Well, I guess I'm not a war expert, so I'll leave the planning to the generals.)

Answer 2

Iran has agreed to cut their programs down to 4%. Atleast 80% is needed to be halted to prevent any production of nuclear bombs. Although, this doesn't appear to be good enough for the United States. It wants Irans unconditional surrender with nuclear weapons forever. The United Statesand Isarel have but already decided to bomb the hell out of Iran no matter what.

Answer 3

America should NOT slap them, if fact that would be the worst thing we could do. The current government ran on a platform of helping the poor and of open government. With a large and highly educated young population the chances are slim of the current government maintaining power unless there is a unifying threat from outside such as an attack by the US.

Answer 4

the following is the reality. Iran has an monetary equipment the size of Finland's and an annual protection funds of round $4.8 billion. It has no longer invaded a u . s . because the previous due 18th century. the U. S. has a GDP it is sixty 8 situations higher and protection costs that are one hundred ten situations more beneficial. Israel and each and each and every Arab u . s . (except syria & Iraq) are quietly or actively allied hostile to Iran. And yet we are to trust that Tehran is about to overturn the international equipment and replace it with an Islamo-fascist order? What planet are we on? at the same time as the really average Mohammed Khatami grow to be elected president in Iran, American conservatives referred to that he grow to be only a figurehead. authentic potential, they suggested (wisely), exceptionally administration of the militia and police, grow to be wielded through the unelected "ultimate chief," Ayatolla Ali Khamenei. Now that Ahmadinejad is president, they declare his finger is on the button. (Oh wait Iran don't have a nuclear button yet and could no longer for no less than 3 to eight years, in accordance to the CIA, in which aspect Ahmadinejad would no longer be president anymore. yet those are basically data.) In a speech, Rudy Giuliani suggested that at the same time as the Soviet Union and China will be deterred in the course of the chilly conflict, Iran can not be. the Soviet and chinese regimes had a "residual rationality," he defined. Hmm. Stalin and Mao--who casually ordered the deaths of 1000's of thousands of their personal people, formented insurgencies and revolutions, and starved entire areas that hostile them--were rational persons. yet no Ahmadinejad, who has done what that compares? between the unusual twists of the present Iran hysteria is that conservatives have grow to be highly charitable about 2 of historic previous's mind-blowing mass murderers. very last 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, the Princeton student, Bernard Lewis, an in intensity adviser to Bush and VPresident Cheny, wrote an op-ed in the Wall street mag predicting that on Aug. 22, 2006, President Ahmadinejad grow to be going to end the international. The date, he defined, "is the evening at the same time as many Muslims commemorate the evening flight of the Prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to "the farthest mosque", oftentimes referred to with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and again. this may properly be deemed an proper date for the apocalytic ending of Israel and if needed of the international" (my emphasis). this may all be humorous if it weren't so risky.

Answer 5

The answer to your first question is a resounding No. Iran has stated repeatedly that it will not suspend enrichment. The answer to your second question is, They already have and will continue to do so until they are called out on the carpet so to speak. The answer to your third question sadly, is No. The war in Iraq has divided our country so badly that it would take a literal attack on our country by Iran in order to gain enough support to go to war with Iran. Just my opinion>

Answer 6

Iran has a right to develop nuclear energy just like every other country on this planet.

And, according to our own CIA, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF AN IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM!!!!!!

Bush is just trying to set Iran up so he can attack. He has NEVER used diplomacy, which is inherently MANDATED by our Constitution. His ONLY purpose is to back Iran into the corner in the hopes that they will attack first.

I'm sure if this doesn't work, Bush will make up some WMD-like LIE and attack anyway.

.......................................

Answer 7

Iran will not be diplomatic. They will continue to ignore the UN, NATO & everybody else. The only thing that will stop them is military force.

Answer 8

You can't reason with them They think we all are out to get them, they have a leader that is about half loony, they teach hatred to 6 year olds. I say blow em up. All of them. But I pray that Bush will use his brains before he decides to go into a conventional war with them.

Answer 9

They need to be bombed back to the stone age.

Answer 10

no.