No she would not. You can disagree, and thats fine, but I'll tell you why.
1. She's playing the woman card - I'm a woman too, but I know much better women who could be president that Hillary Clinton. Take, Kathleen Sebilious, or whatever that govener in Kansas is, she gets the job done and was in Time magazine for one of the top 5 governors other. And besides, I'm not going to base a vote because that particualr person is a minoroty or a certain gender, I'll vote if they are intellegent, have character, and the wiseness to be able to operate as a leader.
2. Her many controversies:
The anti-semetic controversy
Cattle futures
Tammy Wynette
Whitewater
Travel office Firings
Vince Foster
Here's a good one - Improper actions w/ FBI files...FBI files, when the hell did she have the right to get access to that?!
Imaginary discussions w/ Elenaor rosevelt...what is she a sychic or something? I don't want someone who isn't mentaly healthy running the country
Role in 1996 campaign finance controversy
Changing sports affiliations - Okay, if you flip flop on sports, how the hell do you think she'll do politic wise, hmm?
Ghostwriters - she took credit and gave them none...lazy
2006 Martin Luther King Day comments
And frankly, just because you were married to the president, and your husband cheated on you, doesn't mean we are going to give you the president seat out of sympathy. I hate all these feminazi women waving their female banner thinking "wow a first female president" Well you know what ladies, I'm a lady too, and I dont' want to have the first woman president of the united states be an embarassment for all women. Get an intelligent woman up there, they exist, but it's not Hillary.
2007-02-19 13:37:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Namaste 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
I would never support Hillary Clinton. There are a couple of reasons for this:
1. I think her views on things are stupid. She makes an idiot out of herself every time she gets in front of a camera by trying to act like she can be the salvation of the country. Please....
2. She could never be a good military leader because she's never been a huge supporter of the military. First thing she would do as president would be call all troops back home immediately. As much as I would like them home I don't want thousands of Iraqi's on their heels, and I'm afraid that would happen. If we have to be fighting somewhere I don't want it to be on our own soil.
3. There are too many countries in the world where its a part of their culture to not have a whole lot of respect for women. Would we be crazy enough to put one in the Chief Executive position? There are thousands of Americans that could never take her seriously. Imagine if we had her as president. There are many not happy with what we have now, but its better than Hillary Clinton.
2007-02-19 13:42:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by whosaysdiscoisdead 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
I am not ready to trust her with the reins to the military, based entirely on the politics that she has shown while she was in office.
She is firmly opposed to the War in Iraq, yet she believes that military intervention should occur in Darfur? I know that the Darfur situation is a crisis, but jeez...
Saddam Hussein was putting people in death camps, too, people. How hypocritical is she to want to intervene on behalf of one population, but not another? Especially since the US stands to gain from the War in Iraq- monetarily, and in terms of oil and influence in the middle east. On the other hand, there is nothing to gain in Darfur.
I'm sorry, but I want someone that knows what is best for America. I might support the Democratic party if they nominate someone else, but not Hillary.
2007-02-19 13:34:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bobby S 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
No. I don't think she is aware of her surroundings. There are a couple politicians that I would suggest that would make a good military leader moreso than Hillary. They are John Murtha and Wesley Clark. Because both of them were military leaders. If I had had a choice between them, John Murtha would be the better of the two. Because a little common sense carries a great weight, in my book.
If I were to have my choice as to who would replace a wartime President, it wouldn't be Hillary.
2007-02-19 13:59:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by eks_spurt 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
No, I would not support Hillary Clinton, because she seems to me to be an opportunist. She doesn't seem principled, honest, or patriotic. She seems out to climb into power, not to serve the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and America.
I am considering Barak Obama, but I want to read or learn more about Senator John Edwards and Governor Richardson before I decide.
2007-02-19 13:28:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Nope. And I will tell you why. She made this huge thing when her hubby was president about health care. Did health care change?? What happened to the great change? How could she not know that her hubby was cheating on her? Was she really not paying attention? Especially after all the other girls said he was a letch? She stayed so that she could get where she is. And that I think makes her one of the lowest forms of female. She couldn't do it on her own- she used him. Had she stood up and said she wasn't going to tolerate his garbage then I would have some respect. I have none for people who use others.
2007-02-19 13:28:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Shawn 4
·
5⤊
3⤋
I support Hillary Clinton as Secretary of Defense. I also support her if she runs for Presidency.
2007-02-19 15:20:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mike_Hustle 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nope
2007-02-19 13:26:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by tank 3
·
6⤊
1⤋
Not a chance, she is one corrupt human being. For her its just about the power. Any woman that will let her husband make a
%ss of her will let anyone make a *ss of her. She is phony, not honest and wll do whatever it takes to phoney her way into office!
2007-02-19 13:36:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
What did Hillary ever lead? Besides Bill by the ears? She didn't do that very well either, he still managed to get BJ's and play hide the Cigar with Monica.
2007-02-19 13:26:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by John P 6
·
6⤊
3⤋