While the Congress & President debate over US military funding for Iraq do they realize that Al Qaeda is again

Question

gaining the power in Pakistan & Afganhistan and Bush can't do anything about it because he doesn't have ENOUGH TROOPS?

Answer 1

That's Bush's fault, as well as everyone who went along with the idea that war in Iraq was intelligent. They never finished business in Afghanistan, but decided Iraq was more important. Now, there is minimal presence in Afghanistan, which is allowing this build up to happen.

People are not supporting the war as much as they used to, and that will show as a hit to the number of volunteers who join the Armed Forces.

Answer 2

Why does everyone rely so much on the easy answer of "more troops"? Troops are not in endless supply. If you keep sending more troops, the military will have even more trouble keeping up recruitiment levels then they are now. There needs to be an effective strategy change. Its time to start talking to the neighbors and other muslims to better understand the enemy we are fighting. Al Qaeda will continue to recruit more fighters as long as we keep fighting "aimlessly". The US needs to get the support of other muslim nations in this fight. This would legitimize the fight in the eyes of muslims and help to pinpoint the attacks on terrorist forces.

Answer 3

You are wrong on both points. Bush is not in the debate, he laid down the law, congress is debating. We can't fight Al Qaeda in Pakistan, the Pakistanians won't allow us and we are winning in Afghanistan. Any more questions you need answered with authority?

Answer 4

The smart one realize it, the ignorant ones think that Al Qaeda is in Iraq.

Answer 5

ironically talking , the U.S. won't be able to even shelter their own borders. yet to handle your question , evaluate right here. To the east , Iraq's border stretches some six hundred+ miles (Iran) , consistent with hazard seven-hundred+ miles to the south/southwest , (Kuwait & Saudi Arabia) , style of a hundred miles to the west (Jordan) , and finally 525+ miles to the north/northwest (Syria & Turkey). it might have been an ominous job to attempt and shelter such an intensive expanse of land and would have required a unilateral attempt. Unilateral to contain whom? Which international locations would connect the U.S. in such an project? word the neighboring international locations alongside those borders, and then upload to that those truthful Russians mendacity further north , purely waiting. This area is taken under consideration one of unrest and instability, and regrettably, many international locations surrounding Iraq have agendas and are contributing in different the form to perpetuate the fiasco there. The Al Qaeda, and different terrorist communities, have cells and training camps scattered in the time of this area and now , like a team of ravenous rats , they're popping out of their holes to ceremonial dinner. I liken them to the Kamikazi (suicide) pilots of world conflict II. they're blindly pushed via their ill ideologies to the destruction of all , or maybe themselves. So how does everyone provide up hordes of creatures with demented minds , bent on disruption , and advertising it in each achievable style they are in a position to? maximum ideas in coping with them fail through fact standard strategies are ineffective against their form of mentality and technique. to handle an enemy such as they're , you need to think of like them , consume , sleep , and smell like them , and then use the comparable strategies they do , greater or much less giving them a flavor of their own medicine, yet Western custom prohibits that form of mentality through fact it does not be humanitarian. Your question , a tough one certainly , wasn't replied i'm particular. yet , did everyone , would desire to everyone , foresee what grow to be to come back , on the onset of this entire Iraq ordeal? earlier you answer that , consistently undergo in strategies one element , hindsight is 20-20. Camelot , this grow to be no longer , isn't .

Answer 6

That's why it was so stupid to attack Iraq before dealing with al Qaeda

Answer 7

If its not just one of his lies. Seems odd that it comes out when they are trying to stop his funding !!!!!!!!!!!!! Hes not against lying to get his way. Like a spoiled little 2 year old.


Why would The packi's let us...... Look at the distruction we have caused , way more then 911...... on THEIR home soil.

Answer 8

Bush does not mind sacrificing the troops he has now. He'll think of something....

Answer 9

i agree with you. the democrats are just making things difficult for the current administration to serve their political agenda. it will cause more harm in the long run than good. the ppl need to know this!

Answer 10

What do liberals care. They have their power back. Its time to cut and run now.