PNAC's next target was Iran.
It worries me tremendously that I've seen Krystol pushing this anti-Iran agenda a lot as of late.
You should have seen him on Fox News Sunday. It was a sight. And Juan Williams gave him a definite talking to.
2007-02-19 12:32:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mrs. Bass 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
I totally agree with your view..Actually Saudis are abetting Sunnis in Iraq to carry out insurgency against Us troops....Ignorant or willfully ignoring the fact,it keeps blaming Iran for the quagmire and also paving the way to a new war which could have far more consequences back in US....What to do..Saudis are supporting US( and its producing surplus energy and that provides your answer)..Unlike Saudi, Iran is only producing nukes for use in civilian sectors and US which has got the huge stash of nukes can't stand another nuke power coming up...
2007-02-19 12:33:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by vinodh S 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Saudi Arabia has funded almost every Islamic nuclear program and has been reported to have acquired nuclear weapons from their funding of Pakistans nuclear program. Saudi Arabia has been and remains the number one source of Terror funds worldwide for two decades. Al-Qaeda originates from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia has been providing the funds and the sources to puirchase Strela missiles used to shoot down our aircraft. Most of the foreign insurgents come across the Saudi border.
Goofus will do nothing, he is virtually paralyzed at this point. What can Goofus do? He has been played like the Deliverance banjo by his Saudi friends.
2007-02-19 12:28:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Timothy M 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The battle plan is to galvanize the US led puppet regime in Iraq to fight against Iran solving two problems. These 2 countries represent upwards of 20% of world oil reserves, control of either and/or both represents control of the world oil market and potentially boom economies for Western countries for another 20 to 60 years while it lasts.
2007-02-19 12:52:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is trying to divert the spotlight away from his friends the Saudis and Bin Laden the same tactics he used to divert us away from Afghanistan and Into Iraq allowing his buddy Bin Laden who he seem to have totally forgotten about to escape
2007-02-19 12:27:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Congress and the president are on the different aspects of the communicate concerning Iraq without answer in website. i trust the blame lies with the president for the following causes: a million) He pre-emptively went into Iraq lower than questionable causes that destroyed many alliances we had gained after 9/11. 2) Osama Bin Ladan - the assassin of over 3,000 people on u . s . soil continues to be free using emphasize Iraq has placed on our militia. 3) Going into Iraq low-cost and quick grow to be a disasterous militia plan and has brought some civil conflict. All he had to do grow to be call his dad to substantiate why he pulled out of Iraq short of Baghdad in the first Gulf conflict. 4) Billions of U.S. tax money unaccounted for in Iraq and at the same time as the auditors puzzled it, they were fired. 5) Many questionable militia contracts presented to the properly linked. 6) almost all of people want our troops out of Iraq. 7) the in trouble-free terms militia answer in Iraq is to tug out or appreciably enhance the militia presence that ought to in trouble-free terms be done through a draft. the yank people gained't help a draft. i trust the president has acted in the interest of himself and his get mutually and not in any respect the yank people. Impeachment must be strongly seen.
2016-12-04 09:45:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's because there both in each others back pockets. The hard core Bush supporters will never believe this to be true. You could place every bit of evidence on there laps, and it wouldn't matter one iota. To them, Bush is God. Mean while soldiers die and are horribly maimed for lies and they act like they care. Pathetic isn't it.
2007-02-19 12:26:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Third Uncle 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
There is a much easier solution to all this stuff. I wonder if Bush has considered bring his troops back home. Or is that too complicated.
2007-02-19 12:26:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by K. Marx iii 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush doesn't have a clue as to what he is talking about. After six years, everybody knows that.
2007-02-19 12:26:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush doesn't know the difference, any person with brown skin is an "Islamo Facist" to him
2007-02-19 12:31:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sean 4
·
2⤊
1⤋