Sorry. Couldnt resist.
The question should be "DIVIDE and CONQUER"
2007-02-19 12:03:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mike_Hustle 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Assuming that the U.S. invades and conquers Iran (which is implausible, in my opinion), probably Afghanistan (again).
Saudi Arabia is another country the U.S. could pick a fight with in the future. To me, the U.S. has a strong ambition to "secure" the Middle East for its own benefit.
Whatever the case maybe, the cycle of global war and violence will continue.
The bully will never learn, the bully people will never change.
2007-02-19 12:05:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roland 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
You know what, if I were in college, I'd probably be stoned out of my mind right now thinking about it. But that's the old me.
Who's left anyway?
North Korea? Crap, we just gave them oil on the cheap. Maybe they'll stop teaching their people we're sinister.
Cuba? Now this would be a coup. But then, what would happen to Miami afterwards? The sugar prices would also go through the floor, assuming production could be restored to the pre-Castro levels.
Venezuela? Nah, let's do it the old fashioned way, a CIA-funded insurgency.
2007-02-19 12:09:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's funny "President Bush will try and Conquer"
2007-02-19 12:02:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nancy, it's not about conquering but rather pre-emptive strikes against the terrorists. It all comes down to a simple question. Where would you rather fight the terrorists? In the U.S. or on their soil?
2007-02-19 12:03:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by politicsforthefuture 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
wow. wake up... what fantasy world are you in?.. oh yea the anti-administration fantasy...
Well, after being forced to defend ourselves from an Iranian attack/threat...
well hafta stop Venezuala, Russia, Syria, Lebanon, Somalia, China...
and i think im missing a few...
would u rather that?
or would u rather stop the threat as nonmilitarily as we can now, before it escalades into sumthing unstoppable?
thats what seperates the democrats from the republicans
2007-02-19 12:02:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Corey 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
He will be out of office by then. Is term ends in less then 2 years
2007-02-19 12:06:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jeronimo 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
We are not trying to conquer anybody!!!! We are trying to help the Iraqs but they are not helping themselves.
2007-02-19 12:09:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dizney 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Canada, they have more oil then Iran, I don't know what he will use as an excuse, but I am sure that president Cheney will think of one.
2007-02-19 12:00:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
North Korea or China. Thank-god he won't be in office by then.
2007-02-19 12:02:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Andrew H 2
·
0⤊
1⤋