actually they are doing the same thing to her that they did to Gore when Bush was appointed president by the supreme court she should take it as a compliment to what she stands for cause why else would one party be so afraid of one person could be because maybe and i say maybe the sheep in America have finally woke up to the twisted plots of republican greats like Carl Rove who courted the religious right got their vote and laughed at the stupidity of the leaders of the movement the people all thought at the very least if you carry a bible you must be Christan
2007-02-19 14:31:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's the same old, same old..Whenever the repubs perceive a threat to the status quo they start making personal attacks and cloud the issues by harping on one area of a persons actions. Hillary may not be electable, she has made some mistakes, but all we will ever hear about is how her husband had an affair, or many affairs, who knows? This equates her, in the conservatives eyes, as less than a women because if she was a real woman she coulda kept her man satisfied..and that is what a woman's function is right? Plus, she see's herself as equal to men. Can't have that can we? She is too intelligent to lead America. I will keep saying this to all thinking people. Get the hell out while you can.
2007-02-19 12:03:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't think it goes far enough.
Billary Clinton is the biggest threat to the United States since Jimmy Carter.
I think you need to take the blinders off and look at the whole picture, skippy. And the key word in your question about healt care and Billary is "tried." She "tried" to get something done, and failed. Yep, she failed because the Republican congress wouldn't let her spend the money that she wanted to spend...wanna guess where the money was going to come from? Higher taxes, of course! That's the Demoncratic way, after all - tax and spend, tax and spend!
2007-02-19 12:34:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Team Chief 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I hate to be so very blunt but here it is= I commend Hillary Clinton for working through her problems with her husband and that men cheat because of their sin nature( so do women, it happens). But Hillary Clinton in my sight scares me. To not stand on one side or the other and say" Why can't we be friends" but bashing the actions of Bush. This is what i imagine= she creates the illusion of world peace and becomes the evil dictator of the world, destroying the U.S. (because the U.S. is not in the book of Revelations) and causing pain and oppression to all the world. In my sight, she is the Anti-Christ. She promises peace but will give destruction. Oh, yeah, I almost forgot, I am a firm woman who would vote for Condelisa Rice if she ran for president in the near future!
2007-02-19 12:36:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ann 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
And who exactly should be the provider of that health care? The government or the parents?
Stop throwing up the strawman argument that Republicans don't care about children's health. Republicans don't believe that everyone should have to sacrifice the freedoms we have in choosing our own health care to provide for everyone under a government-run (into the ground) one size fits all (but really no one) program that will be wraught with fraud, mismanagement, rampant cost escalations, and diminishing quality of health care for everyone.
2007-02-19 12:00:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
You're so right! It's all about Hillary's valiant effort toward health care for all children not the lies, fraud and various other things that we dislike about her. And she is all about health care for all children and to hell with anyone else! Pahleeze!!!
2007-02-19 11:56:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
You are wrong. Hillary wants health care for the kids that are left un-aborted. She thinks, the more we abort, the cheaper it will be for those who live.
2007-02-19 11:59:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Republilcans DON'T care about children's health! I saw Dick Cheney SPIT on a leper-baby, and George Bush ATE a small child WHOLE! like a PYTHON!
Hilary is a Michael Harrington socialist, who just wants to spend YOUR money on things you just haven't gotten around to, because you have more important things like making suer your OWN kids are healthy.
But screw YOUR kids - there are OTHER kids that need YOUR money. And Hilary will give it to them!
She doesn't give a rat's-*** about health care.
2007-02-19 11:59:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hillary is not 'leader' material nor has her party any new direction - best to stay with the Republicans...
2007-02-19 12:23:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by don m 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
It does not earn them money.
The Republicans have a goal to lower America's standards and erase the middle class.
They are run by war mongers and creatures lower than the dirt under your shoes. They do not care for children unless it is something they themselves bred.
Personally, I put HC in the same social category. I received a very racist email from her a few weeks ago and it only validated my thoughts on her. But I would not keep help from children just because the woman makes my stomach turn. I am sure she is going to town on this for brownie points more than true dedication to the the people.
They care for the money they can earn selling the arms their factories make to kill children in another part of the world.
Do not expect much from the Republicans. They are too busy pouring money into wars and munitions which YOU pay for with your taxes and THEY profit from by selling them. They are too busy building the 600 FEMA concentration camps in America to think of children.
Children? Bah humbug!
WOW lookit all the thumbs downs I got for stating the truth. Hurts huh folks? Too bad you don't lose points for every one you give. Much nicer to give them than take them away!
Would I get more bad reviews if I say I am Muslim? Cos I am.
2 hours later and more thumbs down! Thanks everyone.
2007-02-19 11:52:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6
·
0⤊
5⤋