Selling the parts is much less a sin than the actual abortion, so why not?
2007-02-19 11:38:56 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Hey guys, just trying to make a point. It's hypocritical to allow the abortion and not be allowed to sell the parts. Abortion is murder.
2007-02-19 13:31:20 · update #1
No, definitely not. It turns a human being into a commodity.
2007-02-19 11:41:07 · answer #1 · answered by blondie 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Usually abortion is not performed after the 3 month of pregnancy -even by then the fetus is still so small that there is no way to use those "baby parts" - as you call them.
The only useful thing that can be done with such a young fetus is to use the stem cells. But you can get stem cells from the umbilical cord anyway. (That's where the stem cells that are being used today usually come from).
If anyone should be able to use the aborted fetus for any medical purpose it should be the hospital and not the woman. But I think even that is unethical - at least they would have to follow a well defined protocol.
And why is abortion a sin? Who are you to judge?
2007-02-19 11:51:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's a legitimate question. Liberals who think that abortion is OK should have no problem with the mother selling the baby parts. After all, as liberals often say "it's not a person".
My opinion is that the abortion is just as bad if not worse than the selling of the parts.
and to those who say that an aborted baby has no parts, take a look for yourself
WARNING.
http://www.jonsplace.org/rel/abortion_pics/pic_6.jpg
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/AbortionPictures/images/abortion-22-01.jpg
2007-02-19 11:49:36 · answer #3 · answered by charbatch 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How times have changed in only 9 years>>> Planned parenthood sells baby parts :( and abortion is now done until the fetus has not yet had a breath. Except in Australia where is it called after birth abortion.
God will punish us for this. I pray He is merciful.
2015-08-29 16:42:59 · answer #4 · answered by Stella 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who gives a flying **** if it is a sin or not. your religion is all lies anyway.
and btw. abortions arent allowed after the baby has viable parts. if the baby is matured enough to have any parts that are salvagable they cant legally abort it. also there is no open market for hears the size of you finger nail exept maybe as food. the only good an aborted fetus liver would be is to sell it as rich people food or put it in another fetus. and they dont do surgery on feti. so the only thing it would sell as is food. and it would be the biggest waste ever. because look at your pinky nial (assuming you keep it cut and your hands arent the size of J-Lo's ***) any one part of a fetus is about half the size of your pinky nail.
so no selling aborted feti parts on the black market is useless and your question is dumb. only thing is to sell the whole fetus and then the only people that want them are labs and freaks. labs can be shut down for buying black market feti so they dont buy them. that leaves the freaks. crackhead who like to rub themselves with dead things. good luck finding a big market for them. most freaks who buy black market humn parts want blood to drink not feti to molest.
2007-02-19 11:47:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You are such a fool, firstly when an abortion takes place it cannot be past 12 weeks (i think ) and at this point there really isn't much baby there, so there would be no parts to sell. Secondly its a women's choice so what the hell are you doing criticising women about something you obliviously know nothing about.
2007-02-19 11:43:24 · answer #6 · answered by f_jayce 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i'm professional selection additionally...to a factor. jointly as i believe a woman has the final to her physique and what's interior of it, abortion should not be used as a type of beginning administration. i believe if someones amture sufficient to be having intercourse then they might desire to be mature sufficient to handle the end results of having unprotected intercourse and getting pregnant, i.e. coping with the 9 months of being pregnant and then preserving the toddler or giving it up for adoption. interior the unlucky circumstances of rape and ensuing pregnany, thats whilst abortion is appropriate to me. Its no longer viewed homicide because of the fact the fetus continues to be component of the womans physique and recognized her selection. because of the fact the toddler has no longer had the prospect to take a breath its no longer viewed human rather and subsequently no longer unlawful to abort. the females who kill their toddler after this is born are sentenced o existence in reformatory for killing a toddler who has been born and is respiration. i assume the version is that ladies who've miscarriages and such from falling, that cant be viewed homicide to boot. yet I dont comprehend rather. In all honesty Im stumped approximately this to boot. As for the human beings that say that why abortion ought to be unlawful. properly as I reported above..it would no longer be interior the unlucky case of rape ensuing in being pregnant. yet there ought to be regulations set. And youthful females and ladies who see it as beginning administration might desire to have chastity belts placed on till theyre mature sufficient and to blame sufficient to have secure intercourse.
2016-12-18 06:47:55 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theres nothing wrong with abortion or selling parts. If a babys not alive who cares if you kill it. the worlds overpopulated anyway. as far as selling parts, hey someones gotta use em.
why is everyone saying horrible things and reporting you? Its not an insane question. Hell, if id thought about it I would have asked it.. all these answers above mine are the dumbest things ive ever heard. damn christians
2007-02-19 11:42:17 · answer #8 · answered by flonkas 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Whether the babies aborted or not it is still a human being and selling human body parts is and should be illegal.
2007-02-19 11:56:12 · answer #9 · answered by jorst 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, why not, it's already dead and its her's and her body, right? Why should the hospital get more money for it? She probably had to pay for the abortion, why shouldn't she get money for the baby, oh I mean fetus.
I dig your question, struck a harsh cord with most, made a wonderful point!
2007-02-19 11:48:33 · answer #10 · answered by Ernimay 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's just pathetic. You'd have warped people getting pregnant just so they can abort and make money selling the baby. That's just plain sick.
2007-02-19 11:44:30 · answer #11 · answered by lostjane 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋