http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38213
http://www.progressiveu.org/190000-wmds-found-in-iraq
Here's just a few articles. They were found. Do your research.
2007-02-19 11:08:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋
You are very uneducated on the facts of this war and of how the military works. They had intelligence that there was the capability for Sadam to have WMDs, he had used biological warfare to kill hundreds of his own people and was causing instability in the region. This is bad for business so we went in, took him out,tried to establish a democracy (which I dont think will work) and now the conflict between the sheits and the sunnis are causing even more instability in the region as they battle for power now that saddam is out. I agree we could have thought it out a little better but this has nothing to do with bush doing this for "his own selfish reasons". He is the elected official commisioned to run the country and he doest have a lot of time for each matter so when the CIA says "hey they got WMD's, handle that" than thats what he basiclly does.
Meanwhile there is no draft and we still have a volunteer army so the soldiers know what they are signing up for and are aware that they may die, although historicaly speaking the casualtie rate is outrageously small. We have actualy had quite a lot of success in the middle east despite what the liberal media would have you believe. They are the same group that complains bush didnt send in enough troops and then when he wants to send them now they complain about that. I just joined the army to go accomplish the missions and the last thing I need is people like you and the democrats trying to de-fund my attempt at winning this war. This is like a game of poker, but the stakes are higher and failure is not an option. I cannot believe the liberals are in the streets screaming "Surrender to the terrorists we want to lose".
Iran is a bigger problem than Iraq, they actually have WMD's, and nuclear ones. They will be next. Have some damn loyalty to my beloved country and things will be fine.
2007-02-19 11:29:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
There were some WMD found in Iraq. Saddam hid the rest of them. Tell me little miss know it all, why don't your pick up a paper or watch the news once in a while.
And what selfish reasons would President Bush have to invade Iraq? It can't be for oil since the majority of the world's oil is in Saudi Arabia. Besides, tell me where is all of this oil since you know so much?
2007-02-19 11:19:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Where are you when some of many of those weapons were found? Did you actually do some research before posting the questions? Or you just hear some rumors and think they are for real? Iraq supports anyone who act against US, it is a fact! We cannot war against Iran because we will lose it! But let Iran has nuke means give nuke to terrorists - I will wait to see what will the next administration do to solve this problems! 1 thing that I ask God: why someone who wants to do something to stop terrorism like me and someone who wants to do nothing to stop terrorism like you are both victims of terrorist's attack! Why it is so unfair that I has to be a victim of your act! Did you has anyone died as a victim of terrorism? Could you feel our pain? Do you want your loved ones to become victims of terrorism?
2007-02-19 11:31:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by holyfire 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
#1 I hope you're not that stupid to think that Bush would be on this stupid board.
#2 I guess you didn't keep up with the news, they found some in Iraq but then if you had the balls to join the military, you'd know already and they could treat you for that insanity you have.
#3 If it weren't for Bush, there's a good chance that you'd already be dead. Oh well, he couldn't do everything right like some of you democraps seem to think you do.
And fancy that, I'm not even a Bush fan.
2007-02-19 11:25:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
This is REALLY OLD news. Don't you have anything better to rant about?
They have found lots of weapons. They have also stated that the WMDs were based on incorrect info. Give it up dude!
As for Iraq/Iran ties - that is news - they have proven that there are lots of weapons going to the bad guys from Iran (unless you read the LA Times since their version is different and wrong.)
2007-02-19 11:10:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dizney 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
ya we should leave them alone so they stop supplying us oil and we will go into a huge deppresion and then they will team up with north korea and plan a nuclear attack on us and kill millions of americans. Are you retarded. We need to stop them before they can do that. You aren't greatful for the wonderfull country you are in. If you had it your way we would be just another country and be weak and most of are people will be in poverty. I am glad you are not smart enough to become a president, because that will be the day that the US will fall and be taken over by Iran and North korea.
2007-02-19 11:15:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by John Smith 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Ok. Here is a big stick. You beat the dead horse for a while. I am gonna go have a cold beer.
In the mean time, I will be happy to go to war with Iran, just for sh*ts and giggles. Are you familiar with Operation Earnest Will, Operation Praying Mantis and Operation Prime Chance? How about the events of 3-July-1988? We have already been to war with them. Lets do it again. I don't think they have the sack to hold up.
What will Bush's "own selfish reasons" be for Iran? And in answering as a question edit, please explain in absolute detail.
Thanks. Yeah.
2007-02-19 11:16:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
BILL CLINTON AND THE LIBERAL BEDWETTING DEMOCRATS LIED AND SOLDIERS DIED. HIS CIA PASSED ON VERY POOR INTELLIGENCE. HERE'S THE VIDEO EXPOSING DEMOCRATS AS THE "WMD GANG". THEY SAID THAT SADDAM HAD BEEN USING WMD FOR 10 YEARS AND VIOLATED NO FEWER THAN 17 U.N. INSPECTION RESOLUTIONS.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE
Owned. We have to do something about these inner-city schools and the poor education they are putting out, but that's another story. This isn't Compton, this is YA.
P.S. 60% of the troops are Republicans and only 7% are Liberals. The last thing the country needs are more Liberals shedding crocodile tears for white, Republican kids from the South. You people know full well you wished they were dead.
2007-02-19 11:07:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
There were over 50 drums of chemical compounds found in Iraq... did you miss that?!
And soldiers risk death as a natural consequence of their job description... (what do you think a soldiers job is?!).
Bush has no selfish reasons, unless you think defending the security of the U.S. is selfish?!
IDIOT!
2007-02-19 11:09:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by love_2b_curious 6
·
8⤊
2⤋
You mean like the
1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
1,500 gallons of chemical weapons
Roadside bomb loaded with sarin gas
1,000 radioactive materials--ideal for radioactive dirty bombs
17 chemical warheads--some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin
to name but a few that have been found so far.
I don't know where they are. That information is probably classified.
Isn't it bed time yet? This place just steadily goes down hill right after school lets out.
2007-02-19 11:12:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋