no its not true...its bunch of gutless liberal talk.... who wants to be on TV all day long.
all liberals care about is their 10 seconds a day on TV. its easier that way for them to win the next election.
2007-02-20 17:22:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pro Bush 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
People without some critical political knowledge talks big! Pres. Bush may not wage war on Iraq at that time; but the next presidents will wage war against it in another time. Research why Iraq is a threat to our security, you will know. For ex.: Saddam supports anyone who acts against US. Don't you think if he alive, Saddam would want a nuke power now?
2007-02-19 11:22:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by holyfire 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's bushes fault he went to Iraq to get oil and revenge for his dad and the the people in Iraq did not case 9/11 it was the Arabians
2007-02-19 11:36:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Saddam threatened the United States with weapons of mass destruction. (You see where that got him) Congress voted (with a 100% vote) to go to war with Iraq.
If you need to blame someone then blame Saddam and Congress.
2007-02-19 11:45:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Many factors went into all this, but it was BushOilCo's decision to invade Iraq, Saddam did not attack Bush.
2007-02-19 11:08:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Gee and here I thought it was because of the Islamo-fascist blowing up things all over the world, including in Iraq. Silly me.
2007-02-19 11:08:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes, Saddam has been proven to not have been a threat and its been proven that Bush lied!
2007-02-19 11:07:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
No Saddam caused it.
2007-02-19 11:06:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
"We didn't start the fire. . ."
But Bush was the first to decide to put it out.
2007-02-19 11:19:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
A.J. must be too young to remember 9/11.
2007-02-19 11:09:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Goggles 7
·
3⤊
4⤋