Your thoughts guys about wwe/tna?

Question

Do u guys think that vince would eventually buy out tna in future or will tna is going to be a future competitor to wwe but if u look at history vince eventually buys out his competitors and tries to monopolize the business, do u guys think if monopolizing is ok or is it wrong to buy out your competitors..in my opinion monopolizing is selfish and mean. u can never see a better product from either companies unless you have a competition and the reason as to why people complain wwe not delivering upto their expectation is cuz wwe hasnt had a single big compeition in a long time cuz vince eventually buys out his competitor and tries to monopolize the business
so what do u think guys..is monopolizing good for business or is it wrong

Answer 1

First, monopolizing is unconstitutional, but I guess Vince gets away with it since there are independents out there. Second, I don't think TNA would ever sell out willingly, WSX might, but TNA's full of prideful people. They'd go down on a sinking ship before they sold out.

Back in the original monday night wars WWE was the fresh new underdog promotion, WCW was the old school pushing pushless company, and ECW was the underground cult hit. Now you have TNA with fresh angles, faces, and ideas, WWE's pushing old timers and running out of ideas, and WSX is a cult hit that has caught on like wild fire. See my point? I'm not saying TNA's going to get big over night and take out WWE, but I'm sure people will eventually turn to an alternative.

Answer 2

Well with the way that things are going right now who knows. Cause a lot of WWE wrestlers are leaving WWE and going to TNA. Like Kurt Angle, Jeff Jarrett,Chris Cage, and Chris Jericho. And I think before all is said and done a lot more are going to be going to TNA nothing against WWE but I just see that happening.

Answer 3

naw, alot of guys are switching from TNA lately. like jeff hardy, MNM

Answer 4

no thats bad to do