He is no more special than the guy standing next to him. His life is not worth any more or less than the next guy. So who cares. If he was man enough to join the military he should be man enough to go to war. End of story.
What say you?
2007-02-19 10:04:24 · 23 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
totally agree with you. andrew did it in the falklands so harry should have a go, all the royals appear in full military uniform all the time, a chest full of medal ribbons and they've never fired a shot in anger.
2007-02-19 10:09:08 · answer #1 · answered by sirdunny 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
basically because president Bush belonged to a shield unit that did not set up it does no longer advise he weaseled out of it. Are you declaring that each and each and every individual in that unit grow to be a weasel? Prince Harry for sure is conscious what we are doing over there and he has no issue going to wrestle for what he feels is ideal. You people and your hatred of a few thing to do with Iraq is not basically ridiculous besides the undeniable fact that it shows lack of expertise.
2016-12-04 09:38:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dont put him down just because he is a royal, think if he does go he will become a bigger target for the enemy than any other person there, I dont think he should go because anyone who has to end up working with him will also become part of that target but I suppose many people would then shout coward or something at him, he is in a no win situation.
2007-02-19 10:11:31 · answer #3 · answered by grahamralph2000 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
His Dad for one, the Queen might. But who knows, since he is the son of Diana and a man not Prince Charles, could he be getting setup for a honorable death at the front?
2007-02-19 10:31:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering he is a very wealthy young man and he would be one of the last to be sent to Iraq if the establishment got it's own way, I think he has showed he is willing despite his privileged lifestyle to fight and perhaps die in Iraq and that shows he thinks his own life is worth no more than anyone elses,
I say good for him he has much more character than Tony Blairs son who is doing a gap year in the White House with his fathers dictator.......... Bush
2007-02-19 10:27:43 · answer #5 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He is a soldier like any other. I'd be surprised if he isn't protected in some way. In any war the upper classes are right behind the men fighting, usually about 40 miles.
2007-02-19 10:20:36 · answer #6 · answered by Robin H 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It matters not to me personally, but as he is a serving member of the Armed Forces, he should go if called upon to do so.
Andrew did and I am certain that HM the Q felt as keenly for his safety and well-being as much as any other mother.
2007-02-19 10:12:21 · answer #7 · answered by Brunetteandred 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is a soldier, we, the general public expect our forces to go to war when called upon, Prince Harry volunteered for, and accepted the Queen's 'shilling' let him earn it.
2007-02-21 05:16:19 · answer #8 · answered by dover56dover 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you really think he will be in the front line????? I was in the Falklands and Andrew was NEVER in action all he did was deliver mail from ship to ship well out of the war zone FACT
2007-02-19 19:41:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think about your own life. Is your life worth it? If so, then so is Prince Harry's. If not...well, that's your opinion. Besides, I think that countries are wasting their own time fighting wars when they can instead focus on other things, like GETTING RID OF ALL THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY CAPITALISM, such as GLOBAL WARMING!
2007-02-19 10:26:06 · answer #10 · answered by Angel 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋