English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just curious if they figured out who would be favored if he entered the race. I'm sick of hearing about global warming, but the guy is the most qualified and he already won a presidential election (well got the most votes anyway)

2007-02-19 09:46:43 · 8 answers · asked by Joshua L 2 in Politics & Government Elections

8 answers

Pretty high. He's already doing quite well for a guy who's not even running, not that far behind the ones who are.

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08dem.htm

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/01/poll.2008/index.html

2007-02-19 10:08:56 · answer #1 · answered by functionary01 4 · 2 1

Al Gore is a has-been as far as national politics goes; if he hadn't gone completely off the rails in 2000 he'd still be in the White House. Instead, he went far-left wing wacko (a la John Edwards) and just threw it away.

Besides, haven't you heard, he's gonna get the Nobel Peace Prize; you know, the same one those morons gave to Yassir Arafat!

2007-02-19 17:58:19 · answer #2 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 2 0

News Flash:

ALFRED GORE did not win the presidency, after the "hanging chads" were counted, george bush gained +15 votes.

Al gore didn't even carry his own state (tennessee) during that election, that should tell you something.

And when did he invent the internet?

2007-02-19 18:39:27 · answer #3 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2 1

I would say he would not qualify at all. He has been to other countries to badmouth the USA.

He did invent the internet though. With liberals that counts for something.

2007-02-19 20:18:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Compared to the worst president in Us history, Washington. I would rate Gore as no better than dirt. He is in no way qualified to run the country. (did you know that his IQ is lower than that of President Bush Jr.?) he is nothing more than a misinformed liberal. Ex-use me for the redundancy. What I mean to say is that he is liberal.

2007-02-19 17:56:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I'd say Richardson is more qualified than Gore. He shouldn't run again. Right now, he's mr. global warming and that'll be the focus of his coverage.

2007-02-19 17:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 2 2

About as high as Kerry.

2007-02-19 17:51:51 · answer #7 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 3 1

He would rank at the bottom. He's an Eco-Hypo.

2007-02-19 17:51:07 · answer #8 · answered by Mother 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers