English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Than the combined coalition have!
Makes you think? Yes? No?

2007-02-19 09:31:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

7 answers

Yes it does! But what makes you think even more is the fact that US defense secretary had a meeting with the President of Pakistan and they discussed how the 2 countries could work together on a spring offensive against the Taliban. The US have also vowed to try and help improve relationships between Pakistan and the Afghan government.

Now i have a couple of questions on that, firstly since when has the US ever worked alongside anybody, don't the prefer to be in control of other countries.

Secondly does anyone find it funny that the US now believes they can play peace keeper. Since when have they ever gone in with their size 10s and made anything better.??

2007-02-20 04:38:49 · answer #1 · answered by Baby 3 · 0 0

Agree with you -

I think the problem is the Country is in internal conflict. As a Muslim nation Pakistan has to allow full acceptance to interpretation of Koran teachings (and be seen to do so) - even when these may be out of step with Western values - But limited resources and lack of willingness of many of its people to enforce Laws - unpopular with elemets within the Country continue to undermine Western Confidence in Pakistan's resolve to root out "terrorist/ Fundementalist" factions or create a stable platform which inspires business growth -

NOTE:-
Her neighbour India (and also similarities with turn away from fanatacism in China ) has and continues to achieve this- thereby attracting new international business and development which draws youth away from destructive religious fanaticsm and towards future prosperity- and far more heathy family and core values - surely these are more Human Ideals than distroying yourself in a futile (terrorist) statement???

2007-02-19 09:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

would you have been so forthright if it had no longer been nameless? possibly no longer, yet that's the explanation for having nameless comments - to get truthful remarks. On stability, grow to be your remarks truthful? if so, you haven't got something to sense responsible approximately. If, on mirrored image, you sense you have been unduly swayed via some present day experience (that's no longer uncommon) then you definately would sense it may be the best element to do to speak to the Prof and to retract your complaint. whether you stand via your complaint, is it attainable that this Prof. is fairly in contact and would decide to appreciate the place he went incorrect? i'm rather particular *I* would. it might take braveness and have faith to persist with this up with the prof. If the two is lacking, you are able to desire to decide to enable it bypass.

2016-10-16 01:08:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The combined coalition? Is that a double edged sword or what?
Sounds like my new hair conditioner X

2007-02-19 10:19:21 · answer #4 · answered by Basket-santa 6 · 1 1

Most people are ignorant. We all have 10 fingers and 10 toes; a heart that beats red blood; bills to pay and mouths to feed. Why discriminate against someone who has a different spiritual philosophy?

2007-02-19 09:37:09 · answer #5 · answered by Orion 1 · 1 1

Yes, but that's life, we only get to hear of our the British and the American soldiers, blame the press!
if people knew the whole truth, attitudes may change, but i wouldn't hold my breathe!

2007-02-19 09:39:52 · answer #6 · answered by Welshchick 7 · 1 1

Makes me think? Not really mate. Try posting in military, they might have something more intelligent to say...... I'm not big in the intelligence stakes....

2007-02-19 09:51:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers