Who says that? What Senators are bringing charges? What are the impeachable offenses? Wishing and knowing what it means are too different things. Most of the parrots say about the war. Congress and Senate authorized it. Now what?
Who says there is evidence?|
If it were really true, don't you think it would be done?
Get serious, Kennedy, Obama, Clinton, and many others would do it if it was real. Otherwise is it just flights of fancy.
2007-02-19 09:28:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jim R 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Because it's a democratic scare tactic nothing more. President Bush has not committed an impeachable act. First of all your watching to much bi est news. People all over the country wish it?? Many say there is evidence of broken laws??? What laws and how many people? 50% of the American people? I think not. You can't believe everything you hear on the news. Try and make a few of your own conclusions by researching facts and looking for the truth. If that doesn't work you can always try anger management. Good luck.
2007-02-19 17:43:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by bankster 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush isnt being impeached because in order to be impeached you must do something wrong and there has been no substantial evidence that he has broken the law. Also, a lot of people pretend to hate Presiden Bush because thats whats "Hot" right now. I am against Bush but at least I form my own opinions. Most people who claim to hate Bush don't even know his views. They just say that because all the celebrities and "cool" people do. I am not against people hating on Bush but if you do, at least back it up.
2007-02-19 19:24:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dougy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Honey, did you fall for the Democrats' Campaign Lies????
The Democrats had no intention to impeach Bush, because they knew he had broken NO laws.
IT WAS A HOAX.
They just talked impeachment to fool the gullible and un-informed like you.
(There are no broken laws by Bush.)
2007-02-19 17:26:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
"Wish it?" "Say?"
Impeachment does not depend on "Wishes" nor does it depend on "hearsay". Impeachment needs proper evidence of a criminal act. Such as lying under oath. Or maybe obstruction of justice.
It is basic stuff taught in civics class...or do they no longer teach civics anymore? Perhaps it takes time away from hand wringing about the environnment?
2007-02-19 17:32:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by anthonyhantonh 1
·
4⤊
0⤋
1. Starting a war. Ok, he convinced Congress to let him do it. No, it was not Clinton's thingie -- see the link.
2. Gitmo, CIA camps, redefining torture, and other violations in International law.
No, I don't want him to be impeached and kicked out of office; then Cheney would take over.
2007-02-19 18:34:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rick J 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
People may wish or say whatever they want, even if they are totally incorrect. In the case of Iraq, Bush merely carried out, with Congressional approval, the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act created by Bill Clinton. Clinton failed, Bush got the job done.
The only impeachable offense, of which Congress is also guilty, is failure to enforce our southern border.
2007-02-19 17:26:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by speakeasy 6
·
6⤊
2⤋
Name me one law that he has broken. He unlike his predessor did not lie under oath. Should they impeach him because the Republicans did that to Clinton? This is just Democratic payback.
2007-02-19 17:32:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
He hasn't broken any laws. Hating somebody isn't enough to get them impeached.
2007-02-19 17:28:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by jabb0404 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
Well, if 'many' have a single shred of proveable evidence they should take it to the attorney general and get the process started. Otherwise hush up and quit kvetching about it!
2007-02-19 17:36:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mad Roy 6
·
2⤊
0⤋