sure
2007-02-19 09:24:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by kingsgirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, that's perfectly legal. Although I'd remove the bit about "This is intended to protect employees privacy" as it's pretty unlikely that's the real reason, and it could cause problems if there was a breach.
2007-02-19 10:04:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not sure here - what happens if two or more employees agree in mutual conversation to waive their rights to privacy in respect of their conversations with one another. Surely then the clause that you outline becomes null and void?
Arch-conservative that I normally am, there is a lot to be said for collective bargaining...
2007-02-19 09:28:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep. It is usually standard, lets say you make 50K a year, and the guy next to you makes 55K a year and you have the same education, but he makes more because he negotiated that salary. Wouldn't you be pissed to find out he gets paid more? You might slow down your productivity, or feel resentment towards you co-worker. Whatever, they don't want that tension, so if nobody knows, everything runs smoother.
2007-02-19 09:31:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no count number if it relatively is a business enterprise's coverage for workers to no longer communicate their pay, pay cost, salaries, or different subject concerns, then they shouldn't communicate it. In an 'at will' employment place, you would be terminated for any reason. meaning that in case you fart in a team assembly, you are able to desire to be fired. It ability that in case you place on a BLUE shirt on "pink shirt" day, you are able to desire to be fired. and in case you communicate your income with a co-worker, you are able to desire to be FIRED. Your corporation does not choose a team of disgruntled youngster video games while it includes artwork and pay. If "Bob" has a artwork ethic and checklist that publicizes he ought to get a 10% pay develop this year, and you in basic terms get 3%, so what. it is your corporation's extraordinary to dole out pay and money as they see greater wholesome. i've got labored for many different protection contractors considering 1987, and each and each has a coverage of no longer discussing pay with co-workers. you won't like it yet don't be shocked in case you get fired for doing so. and you is purely no longer waiting to 'sue'. The particular hearth thank you to get in difficulty is to bypass lower back into your boss, offended and annoying why "Bob" have been given a 10% pay develop and you in basic terms have been given 3%. perchance Bob DESERVED it. yet in spite of everything you do this and you will the two possibly get booted. Yea, you are able to communicate even though you like, yet once you violate business enterprise rules you will get canned.
2016-10-16 01:07:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. This is legal. It is quite common, actually. You can either agree to enter into such a contract or if this is of great offense, you can look elsewhere for employment.
2007-02-19 09:28:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by lizardmama 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ive heard of it before. Generally done by companies who have something to hide I would imagine. Not sure how legal it is.
2007-02-19 09:26:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by jeanimus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes. they do not want you talking about it with other employees because the might not have given the same things to them. you might be making more money / less money and if you talk about it, it will make them mad that they / you do not rate the higher pay or the best benifits
2007-02-19 09:28:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by nbatch2006 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have heard of people being fired for discussing their pay.
2007-02-19 09:26:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by A.Mercer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep, its done all the time.
2007-02-19 09:28:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont believe that it is illeegal
2007-02-19 09:26:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋