I heard Tom Bradys ex is having his baby, will this force him into early retirment.
2007-02-19 09:00:31 · 16 answers · asked by p_rob22 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Probably won't
2007-02-19 09:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO because Tom Brady is a excellent Player. Yes they did not win the Superbowl this year but the NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS are one of the BEST Teams in the NFL. NO they are the BEST. Just because he has a baby on the way does not mean that will effect his playing. This will probably make him a even better player. Some people need 2 get off his back 4 being a good player.
2007-02-22 13:23:40 · answer #2 · answered by Cupcake 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would that force him to retire? He wouldn't be the first player with a baby, and no where near the last. Heck some of them have sole custody and are still playing.
2007-02-19 17:08:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it won't force him into early retirement. He joins the list of thug players impregnating many women. He's trash. Peyton is all class.
By the way, the baby's momma is an actress, so she's not hurting for money either.
2007-02-19 18:29:50 · answer #4 · answered by The Big Shot 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it but now if it is his he will have to pay some child support which will stink for him. Hopefully his ex wont try to force him back with her because of the baby. Hopefully he will keep playing for quite a while
2007-02-19 17:04:41 · answer #5 · answered by Ryne's proud mommy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TOM IS A MACK DADDY, HE'S A PIMP. NOW THE NFL LEAGUE HAS TO WORRY BOUT TOM BRADYS SON "WINNING 3 SUPER BOWLS ALSO LOL IN THE NEAR FUTURE
2007-02-23 16:18:19 · answer #6 · answered by expre33ions 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol, no way. Brady will continue to rock the house on the football field.
2007-02-19 17:04:16 · answer #7 · answered by Al J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...He should demand a DNA test...Who's to say she isn't just out for money cause she was once with him?...If it is his, so be it...He'll pay child support...So he wouldn't retire...
2007-02-19 17:08:10 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why it would. It'll be interesting to see how he deals with this situation if this is his baby.
2007-02-19 17:52:00 · answer #9 · answered by roni26 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nobody retires because of that man
2007-02-19 17:04:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he will support the child and continue playing ball
2007-02-20 09:50:02 · answer #11 · answered by Jim G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋