English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush links terror war to U.S. independence war

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070219/us_nm/bush_presidentsday_dc_1;_ylt=AqV1Tq0F89c7ynPiHKrEhL4Gw_IE

2007-02-19 08:42:14 · 8 answers · asked by sirdoctorfine 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

.
Just look at this picture for 10 seconds. Is this not the funniest thing Bush has ever done?

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20070219/capt.7868481a72c642b9948d4c42703eb5a9.bush__whcd105.jpg?x=380&y=270&sig=PwQjiAntMDDu16Cq3PAznw--
.

2007-02-19 08:43:59 · update #1

8 answers

there both bipedal and have george for a first name, that's about where the comparsions end. One was an extraordinary man the other is a bumbling bafoon who has destroyed almost everything that men like george washington fought for.

2007-02-19 08:51:26 · answer #1 · answered by jlah_lover 2 · 1 1

what's funny about it? and what difference could this possibly make pro or con?..im sure this is taken out of context and is simply a pose with a person involved with reinactment. this reminds me alot of when reagan was making the microphone test and talked of the russians bombing. the left wing extremists, as today, had a field day with it and wouldnt let up until the fifteen minutes were waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy over.
thank god we have a president that has some level of humility and doesnt need to cavort for sexual favors from interns in the white house. and how does linking the war for terror and the war for independence make them alike. bush never stated they were alike and no one else did either. the comment doesnt have enough information to call it tasteless but it appears headed in that direction. i truly wish that the pelosi ites would take the war on terror seriously. the problem is, if the only ones that do are al qaeda, we have more serious issues present then whether or not left wingers can find the latest thing about bush to villify.

2007-02-19 16:56:05 · answer #2 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 1

Comparison and only comparison of them is this.
Both have the same first namd and both have had the title of President of The United States. Other than that GWB isn't worthy of emptying George Washington's outhouse.

2007-02-19 16:55:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

According to Mr. Bush, they are....he was just on CNN comparing his unpolularity to Washington and Truman......HA!!! Bush couldn't polish their shoes....

2007-02-19 19:56:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You've insulted washington [one of the greatest presidents] by comparing him to a monkey

2007-02-19 16:48:27 · answer #5 · answered by Azeem 2 · 1 2

Both are great Freedom-Loving Presidents.

Bill Clinton declared himself: "as the first Black President".

2007-02-19 16:47:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I'm not looking because I am sure that if Bush has false teeth, they aren't made out of wood........So there.

2007-02-19 16:51:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes- they are alike. They have the same first name.
Beyond that- not much else.

2007-02-19 16:44:46 · answer #8 · answered by Morey000 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers