English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is he a complete "idiot"?

2007-02-19 08:20:29 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I just dont understand what he is doing, is he going to go there himself. Wouldn't that be a sight?

2007-02-19 08:35:03 · update #1

Also Steelgrave, take a look @ all the comments!!! I am NOT ALONE!!!

2007-02-19 08:37:41 · update #2

17 answers

This coming from the person who asked this question.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsWhdw3Fvd.zUK70nP0_ehbsy6IX?qid=20070211184509AAdHD0T

Apparently military and geopolitical strategy are not your high points. You can not just pull out of the region there is not a stable government or internal police force to control sectarian violence and radical Islamic groups. If we just leave they will kill each other until Iraq is no longer a nation, or Iran will sweep in and take over establishing just the government no one wants in Iraq, an Islamic Nationalist State. One of the goals is to have a government that is supportive of the west and to have a long term military presence in the country so we can strike out at radical Islam from a nearer location.

I take offense to someone with so little knowledge of the topic calling my President an idiot.

No you are not alone 80% of this and every other country is populated by morons. Why do you think 10% of the people own 90% of the wealth?. Enjoy American Idol.

2007-02-19 08:32:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

You answered your own question he is a Idiot. He doesn't care how many troops are killed and maimed , how many innocent Iraq people are laying in the street covered in flies. He is a total loser , ignorant, stupid, idiotic , crazy, I don't think you could call him human being. I think old Barbara had a monster when she delivered him. He is a very sick whatever he is and needs to be sent into orbit and float around and never see the ground again, take Al Capone with him, ( Cheney)

2007-02-19 16:33:59 · answer #2 · answered by Nicki 6 · 1 1

Sandra, what do you think the repurcussions would be on the Iraqi people if we left suddenly? Wouldn't they break out into further civil war? The military has changed strategy in the last few weeks, and it is working. The violence is much less. In a country that was having, on average, more than a hundred murders per day due to "sectarian violence" (death squads and suicide bombers), Friday only saw 7 casualties of violence in Baghdad. If we leave, they will destroy each other. That is never what we intended to happen, but it did. Don't we owe the Iraqi people better than to leave them in this position? Don't we owe their government our support to help them get established?

2007-02-19 16:28:46 · answer #3 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 2 1

He hasn't quite made the connection solidified yet between Iran and the insurgents that are killing American forces yet!!

Even in the face of the truth coming out that Saudi Arabian backed Sunni's are causing most of the deaths!

He still tries to blame Iran!!

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm

2007-02-19 16:31:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No hes worse. Hes cunning, and doesnt care about human lives.
Hes just another republican raised on a pampered life, who didnt have the b*lls to fight in a war, but so easily orders our military men and women to the front lines and places them smack center in the middle of a civil war.

AND doesnt feel trying diplomacy is something our troops deserve with IRAN, who hes trying to instigate a battleroyal with.

Republicans want more money and more power.
And they dont care who they have to throw to the lions to get it.

What do they teach at those pampered schools anyway.
Guess its everything but integrity and true leadership

2007-02-19 16:27:20 · answer #5 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 2 1

Um no he is not If the troops were to pull out now there would be a power vacuum to be filled by extremists that would make hell on earth. How many times do I have to explain this?

2007-02-19 16:26:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Idiot doesn't cover it.

Bush doesn't really have any say - **** Cheney and a handful of neoconvervative think tank idiots have been screwing this war up since day one.

Don't forget - this is the republicans war. It will be their legacy - billions of dollars wasted, tens of thousands of lives wasted, untold amounts of international goodwill wasted.

Dubya & Co. = Failure Adminsitration.

2007-02-19 16:26:40 · answer #7 · answered by joemammysbigguns 4 · 3 2

No, but you can't tolerate anyone who stands up for something. Got kind of used to Clinton's presdency by the poll results I guess.
It is hard to get people to back down for matters of principle, darn them! It is much more fun to be a spineless democrat without principles, sitting in mom and dad's basement firing up the bong.. what fun, eh?

2007-02-19 16:38:27 · answer #8 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 2 2

I am a retired Sgt.Maj. who has served in both Iraqi Wars.I can tell you this, to pull out now , while the region is still unstable is only going to make them think they can beat the US and all hell will break loose here.You think 9-11 was bad?You ain't seen jack!

2007-02-19 16:26:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

he has no intention of pulling out they are building a 431 acre embassy larger than the vatican, his opposition leaders here are a scan this is a war for Israel

2007-02-19 16:35:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers