2007-02-19 08:14:09 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, I think it would be a bad idea; a real slippery slope.
Incidentally, thanks for the 10 points on a previous question, but I am a little hurt at being called a 'smug SOB'. I am a 62 year old strongly conservative pharmacist, and I took your question to be one bashing conservatives. This tends to get my goat at times. I am sorry if my answer offended you.
2007-02-19 09:09:25 · answer #1 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can be a U.S. citizen, born outside of the USA, if both of your parents are already American citizens. There may be other stipulations too.
There is currently debate concerning the definition of "natural born citizen." The main focus of this debate is whether or not children born to Americans overseas be considered eligible for the Presidency.
2007-02-19 08:24:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That would be like any of us going to another country and running for their leadership position. In the U.S the Constitution has to stay the same way. Only those born in the U.S should be allowed to be President.
2007-02-19 08:18:31 · answer #3 · answered by Cheryl P 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No Way. This is america, lets keep it that way. Next thing people will want is to allow all the illegals to become congressmen. Plus, can you just see Arnold as the Prez, I'll be back.......That sacres me.
2007-02-19 08:26:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question does not make lots experience on the face of it. US voters born exterior the U. S. have been in all probability born on a militia reservation, that's a US territory whether that is in Germany or Turkey or the Phillipines. those all people is US voters. in case you're speaking approximately somebody like Arnold Schwartzenegger who became into born in a diverse united states of america, immigrated to the U. S. and grew to develop right into a citizen ... then our rules of course define him as no longer able to develop into President. could the regulation get replaced? in all probability no longer, yet in the past all people gets disillusioned ... think of roughly it. while our Consititution became into drafted, we've been a rustic of immigrants with very few organic-born voters. there became into no thank you to guarantee the immigrants loyalty to the U. S. because of the fact a super sort of the immigrants have been immigrants against their will. They have been borrowers that have been shipped over right here to get them out of their domicile international places' hair and to maintain themselves out of penitentiary. Nowdays, there remains no thank you to guarantee an immigrants loyalty to the U. S.. many human beings from different international places nevertheless call their old united states of america "domicile". They fly the flag of their "domicile" united states of america on their properties, companies and autos. they do no longer prefer to examine our language, and anticipate all people else to examine their language to speak with them. Are they unswerving to the U. S. or to themselves? do you prefer to probability the appropriate united states of america on the planet to somebody who won't develop into an entire citizen of the U. S.? i do no longer.
2016-11-23 19:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by malan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Because the Democrats would nominate Kim Jong to run for President.
2007-02-19 08:21:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
well if that happens, Ahrnold would be Preisdent, and the cons would be in heaven
2007-02-19 08:19:56 · answer #7 · answered by null 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, just fine the way it is!!!
2007-02-19 08:22:03 · answer #8 · answered by Marge Simpson 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! We don't know them or where their loyalties are. NO WAY...NOT EVER.
2007-02-19 08:20:25 · answer #9 · answered by chole_24 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-02-19 08:20:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋