This is A Formal Debate, I Wan't To Read Arguments If You Think It's A Hoax Or Do You Think it's Real !!!
2007-02-19 08:02:02 · 24 answers · asked by NicoleHere 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
yes, his name was louis armstrong and another was buzz lightyear.
2007-02-19 08:05:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I find it ridiculous that people still listen to the hoax theories about the Moon landing. Yes, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the Moon on July 20, 1969. With the whole world watching and the Soviets monitoring us, such an elaborate hoax could not possibly be pulled off. The Soviets would have had a field day exposing the U.S. as frauds. It is an insult to the astronauts, and all the dedicated people who worked on the Apollo program to say that they faked it. Besides, do you reallly think the US government would have allowed this "hoax" to be shown around the world with all the so called goofs in the production still there. Wouldn't it have made more sense to edit out anything that could expose a fraud? If the government was clever enough to stage such an event, wouldn't they also be clever enough to edit out the potential trouble spots? The fact is, the US did put men on the Moon in 1969 and later. And I'm proud of the achievement!
2007-02-19 16:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by brainstorm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you think the Russians could not detect the origin of communicate from the moon to earth? If the Russians confirm the location, why now you think it didn't happened.
Check the communication grid and you will find that the origin, duration, and orientation pin point where the US put a man. It was the moon. Not once, but several times.
Before you begin a debate, check your facts (observations by two or more persons). You will see that different locations received the communication from the moon. And the locations were not control by the US.
There are those who want to go to the moon again. We have the technology (much better than thirty years ago) but do we have the will?
2007-02-19 16:15:04 · answer #3 · answered by J. 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is for real. There is a great book called Space you should check out and it starts in Germany with those rockets Hitler was launching at London. That was what started it all. It is an older book but even though not totally factual, it makes you wonder and you can research all the information within to verify.
2007-02-19 17:35:41 · answer #4 · answered by Curtis B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be honest the Americans probably would make all that up just to get some limelight.
Not saying I hate Americans that is.....
Anyway there's tonnes of evidence to back both arguments..... I am leaning towards that they didn't go to the moon.
No engine noises were heard, and we should see stars as there's no atmosphere around the moon, yet why didnt we see them? NASA said it was because the sunlight was so strong as it was daytime when they landed.....but i reckon they're just making excuses. why would people say we didn't go to the moon if there wasn't substantial evidence to back this theory? people believe most things the government say etc, then why on this occasion do we not believe we didn't land on the moon. is it because Europeans/Africans etc hate america? is it because we are so bored we start making things up? I don't think so.
It's because there is a shedload of evidence and information to back this up! otherwise people wouldn't have bothered!
Ok ok rant over hehe
2007-02-19 16:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Button.Monster 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes it,s true they have a video of it they jest say they didn,t because it,s so boring in life it was July 16 to The 24th and they landed on the more July 20Th 1969 at 10.56 pm they what to go back again but they are looking for an excuse to good so they lies and do this question jest to play games on your mined it was Neil Armstrong no Louis,i was born on that day that,s why i now the true,
2007-02-19 16:17:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance.
There are so many flaws in the whole landing story.
To many to list but i will give you one to start with other wise we'll be here all day.
There is a radiation belt around the earth that is about a thousand times stronger than normal x-ray radiation used in hospitals.
If you go for an xray in a hospital, the led sheild they use to protect a man testicals is about a cm thick. The led sheilding around the ship was about the same thickness, thus nowere thick enough to protect the astronaughts. It would have LITRALLY fried them to death as soon as they went through it.
Thats only 1. There are thousands. Have fun!!!!
2007-02-19 16:12:10 · answer #7 · answered by trickyrick32 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hoax same as Reagan's Star Wars project. How could they have done it using computers with a brain smaller than a Casio calculator
2007-02-19 16:08:18 · answer #8 · answered by Yeah yeah yeah 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it's real I mean how can you not it was filmed for ****'s sake yeah the flag was moving but tha because the guy was moving the flag pole (you know action reaction that sort of thing) and besides we had to because we had to 1-up the Soviets back then
2007-02-19 16:07:23 · answer #9 · answered by 98' Vortec 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
all the conspiracy theories and so called evidence can be scientificaly dicredited.
trickyrick32: the van allen belt theory was a good 1 but van allen himself rubbished the claims that it was to dangerous for humans to pass through.
2007-02-19 16:26:50 · answer #10 · answered by mowhokman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It might have been a hoax. I'm no rocket scientist but why was there wind blowing the flag when the moon doesn't have wind?
2007-02-19 16:07:16 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋