lol
2007-02-19 07:43:08 · 17 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
An what was that catch phrase,
'Some say' as there source of information
Listen carefullywhen they cleverly TRY to insert that into their research.
"some say"
yeah some say alot of things. Great reporting FOX.
The good thing is that the smart people are starting to turn the channcel little by little.
See the arguement here --- Everyone who knows anything about FOX and sees what they program is simply saying, Go to CNN or elsewhere...yet FOX viewers attack the fact that FOX is great without addressing the true issue -- that FOX is lobsided.
And FOX LOVERS..no matter what O'Reilly says, his ratings ARE NOT at an alltime high or even climbing.
They are dropping insignificantly at this point..no a huge drop...but not the huge esclation as Bill seems to chatter.
Bottom line, is MSNBC gets the last laugh -- Ask O'Reilly what happened ot his speaking engagement for missing and Exploited children.
Thank Kieth Olberman for that!!!!
FOX NEWS Credible.
When they have that Amerosa chick on trying to debate on OBAMA, like shes an authority.
It only shows they will do anythign for ratings.
Every other word out of O'reillys mouth is used to draw ratings rather than report the fair and balanced truth
2007-02-19 07:51:05 · answer #1 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That my friend is the reason I don't rely on those types of news providers. First we need to understand that those stations are simply a business. In order for them to grow and continue to generate profits, their news stories must be entertaining to the masses. Their profits are based on ratings which are based on how many households watch their programs. If the news story they are covering is not "informative or interesting" then no one will watch them thus a reduction in profit. Therefore, they exaggerate, expand, lie, deceive and completely change the story line in order to generate ratings. Secondly, and you should understand this aspect of it all being that you are MI. News stations cannot release all of the known information. While most do, there are some that respect the framework of the story. For example, A crime has been committed and the police have information that only the offender would know. Some networks will work with the police and release this information as to not jeopardize the case. Yes there are some news stations that completely disregard this aspect and they are the ones looking like idiots in the long run. Personally I like to refer to my own connections to get the correct version of the story.
2016-05-24 11:48:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sarlett Ohara states "Why would they go to Communist News Network to get their confirmations?" Well maybe because CNN did such a good job of outing them on the Obama Madrassa story that they figure CNN knows how to investigate instead of taking their news off some idiots blog
see that BS 2 thumbs down for telling the TRUTH about Faux brain washed zombie trolls
2007-02-19 08:16:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why do all you liberals disregard FOX's news yet glorify the rest of the liberal media as golden??!!!
I believe most of the stories reported on the liberal media, I don't try to downplay it as untrue! Yet I know they don't show the whole story, just the liberal side or the side that depicts Cons in a negative way!
FOX just simply shows that otherside the liberal media does not. But since it goes against you guys, you write it off as fictious! How close minded you people are!!!!
2007-02-19 07:55:03 · answer #4 · answered by Bunz 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You mean like how CNN will confirm a story by not airing it? like covering up humanitirian nightmares by saddam and castro just so they can keep their havanna and baghdad offices open? CNN has no credibility. Foxnews does.
2007-02-19 07:52:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
You really are obsessed with Fox News. Wow!
2007-02-19 07:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by bebe 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Contrary to your assumption, Fox News means they have reliable witnesses or solid proof as to the validity of the story.CNN goes to the left wing blogs to get their material.
2007-02-19 07:49:18 · answer #7 · answered by just the facts 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I one heard an interview with the publisher of The Weekly World News (of Batboy fame).
He said it was their job to report the news, not to verify it, lol.
2007-02-19 07:48:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good lord,if you dont like fox news dont watch the damn thing.Your whining is getting old.
2007-02-19 07:51:16 · answer #9 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
It means they've confirmed it with their top officials, confirmed that it's OK to run fiction as news.
Fox news is NOT a news organization. The sooner people understand that and stop watching them, the sooner Fox will be forced to stop their completely responsbile actions.
2007-02-19 07:49:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋