golden acres but again you have to be at a certain age to stay in that place.
2007-02-19 10:24:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
100 a month...no, its not quite enough, especially in Manila. However, to anyone who says 1000 a month I say they are full of it. I lived in Boston, MA for the summer off of about $650 a month by subletting a room in a nice apartment and taking the subway rather than paying for a car and I just lived very moderately. Boston is rather expensive living in the US, but if you know how to manage money you can live basically wherever you want for a good price. With that being said, I bet you could get by in Manila with as little as $300 a month.
If you are looking for a driver, maid, and luxurious living you're out of your mind at that price. Even though there is an exchange rate advantage, the Philippines is not a soup kitchen...this stuff isn't for free.
2007-02-22 05:25:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by big_j_gizzy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Dear Diamond, that's less than what I would have to pay for a small room without a bathroom and air conditioning. And you're talking about having at least two household help here. C'mon, did you really think you can find a place anywhere in the world that is that cheap?
Check out Malaysia, I read on Yahoo that it's the cheapest place to live in.
2007-02-19 19:37:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lady_Lawyer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No
Just for a nice condo it will cost you about 700USD per month just for the rent. You will need to include electricity and different fees associated with a condo. Expect to pay a little over 1,000USD per month just to have a place to stay. A driver and a maid will cost more depending on how much you use thier services.
If you budget 1,500USD / month for the things you listed I do not think you will have any problem so long as you don't travel alot or go far when you do travel.
2007-02-19 08:31:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Prices in Philippines are skyrocketing, especially for housing for foreigners. Not to mention the USD/PHP exchange rate has fallen by about 10 pesos in the past 2 years. Its a really fun place but they are going to ruin a good thing with the greedy attitude. You'll need about $1000 a month minimum to live there bare bones.
2007-02-19 11:53:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Manila is cheap but not that cheap. I just cam back from the PH and 1000 USD is probably the cheapest you can get. That would include a home, driver and food. If you really want to get fancy you could up the amount to 1500.
2007-02-19 07:50:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by izaak21x 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely no, !00 dollars is equivalent only to 4900 pesos or less. Just for the rent for a little decent house you have to shell out 7000 pesos already! So how about the food and the other expenses? Makeit 500 dollars so you can have a decent living.
2007-02-19 11:39:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by kibbs 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
it will be hard for you to live comfortably for $100. that is around 4500-5000 philippine peso depends on the current exchange. the average single filipino need about 300 pesos (around 6 dollars)a day to survive that includes food, transpo, electricity, etc that is associated with living but that is not comfortable. but i depends on your standards of comfortablility. living outside manila with a benjamin in your pocket may provide just a little comfort but it will not sustain you.
2007-02-19 12:46:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by pedro_jose 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
100 dollars in a month? & that kind of living?!
You must be kidding.
Anyways, at least you'll have 1,000 dollars a month.
But it depends on how you want to live very comfy or just moderate in Manila.
(- -,)
2007-02-19 10:20:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
it's not enough. a $100 would give you an apartment somewhere along the not so good neighborhood. that does not include city services, so you need more than that. and with maids and a driver--really need much much more.
2007-02-19 12:41:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by warrior is a child 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd say around 450- 550 dollars a week.
Outside of the city is a little cheaper.
The prices indicated are not for the place you stated though.
2007-02-19 07:59:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by Ray H 7
·
1⤊
2⤋