In 1999 He said I would not support the repeal of Roe Vs. Wade, then yesterday he said I do not support Roe Vs. Wade it should be overturned, isn't this flip flopping and if not why is it different than what Kerry was blamed for in 2004?
2007-02-19 07:31:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Phila. Inquirer yesterday had a whole column on McCain's MANY flip-flops. Like how he denoucned Jerry Falwell as an "agent of intolerance" but now kisses up to him. Like how he opposed Bush's tax giveaways to the rich but now ... You get the picture. He's an opportunistic phony. Like Giuliani.
2007-02-19 07:37:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He is getting there but will never match the "FF" skills of Hillary and Botched Joke Kerry. The point is both sides do it to further the own political agenda.
"It is the duty of any president, in the final analysis, to defend this nation and dispel the security threat. Saddam Hussein has brought military action upon himself by refusing for 12 years to comply with the mandates of the United Nations. The brave and capable men and women of our armed forces and those who are with us will quickly, I know, remove him once and for all as a threat to his neighbors, to the world, and to his own people, and I support their doing so."
Senator John Kerry (Democrat, Massachusetts)
Statement on eve of military strikes against Iraq
March 17, 2003
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
2007-02-19 15:54:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
While on his quest to be the darling of those who trashed him in 2000 when he went against Bush and lost, he has become a spineless duck, losing all his credibility. Americans never have liked a politician who says "me too," no matter what party he may be in.
2007-02-19 15:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You mean, like, bigger than Queen Hillary, The Moron from Massachusetts, Algae the Green Guy, Fat Ted, Ho-Hum Harry, Little Nancy, Diabolical Dick, and the rest of the cast of that gang that calls itself the Democratic Party?
Puh-leeze, you're gonna have to do a whole lot better than that if you want to be taken seriously!
2007-02-19 15:37:08 · answer #4 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He is a rep so there is your answer flops like a fish out of water
2007-02-19 15:42:09 · answer #5 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I used to be pro-murder. Does McCain have conviction on it? Who can know? All I care about is if he will do it.
2007-02-19 23:22:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all politicians are if they stay in the sport long enough
2007-02-19 15:34:31 · answer #7 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋