2007-02-19 07:20:37 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A liberal wouldn't know a fact if it bit him. All they know are twisted lies.
2007-02-19 07:27:21 · answer #1 · answered by penhead72 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
i've got self assurance the constitutional diagnosis would be that the federal shape (as written and amended) neither expressly ensures the wonderful to an abortion nor prohibits abortion. the 10th modification reserves any rights no longer enumerated to the states, or the folk. subsequently, the states would have the wonderful to legislate with appreciate to this difficulty, difficulty to the Due technique and equivalent secure practices clauses of the 14th modification to the quantity they're deemed appropriate. The Roe v Wade case (and its companion case, Doe v Bolton) depended on a "extraordinary to privateness" got here across via the splendid courtroom yet which has been enormously disputed via criminal pupils. while and if Roe is overturned, the difficulty would purely return to the states; lots of the main populous ones, such as manhattan and California, would rather much surely enact the factors of Roe into state regulation.
2016-10-16 00:54:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at mrfeelsgreat9 to find out an example of exactly what you are talking about.
If liberals are all maxists and stalinists, the neo-cons are fascist.
Fascism believes in stifling reasoned debate.
Fascism believes in attacking the "other."
Fascism believes in using fear to control the population.
Fascism believes in not wavering from the party line.
Fascism believes in attacking ideas different from their own as coming from an intellectual elite who would undermine the country.
Fascism believes that ideology is more important than individuality.
Your turn: How are liberals like marxists and stalanist??
2007-02-19 08:00:42 · answer #3 · answered by jcboyle 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Sounds like your judgment is clouding your facts and your rhetoric is based on emotions.
2007-02-19 07:27:36 · answer #4 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Liberal and fact do not belong in the same sentance. Unless you are pointing out the lack there of.
2007-02-19 07:30:05 · answer #5 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
That's funny . . Whoopi Goldberg is a self-proclaimed liberal and she just tried to defend her "feeling" in lieu of "thinking."
2007-02-19 08:43:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Alright!!!! Alfred E. Newman for President!!!!!
2007-02-19 07:26:55 · answer #7 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because we know how to win an battleof wits and always come well armed
2007-02-19 07:34:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
LMAO! Yes, liberals *always* have "facts" on their side.
Thanks for playing!
2007-02-19 07:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I noticed that you have no sources to cite.
There's a reason for that, isn't there?
2007-02-19 07:29:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋