please tell me this isnt true.i am not spending 600$ on a ps3 then 63 on the game they cant do this i understand that the ps2 is entering its final days.its a little stupid that there only putting it on ps3 if they do they lose money.you dont just buy a game system to play 1 game thats retarded.the other kingdom hearts were on ps2 and the 3rd one should be 2!!!!!!!!!!!! for once im not liking sony agreeing to this and bvg doing this.
2007-02-19 06:35:07 · 4 answers · asked by fang 2 in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
loose talk been saying that they are most likely spread it on to other systems, and might make another C.O.M. for a hand held system possibly the DS. and sora is a gimp, if you sing under the sea 6 times in a level,you will be sitting on the bench with raiden. its a fun game, just a bit too cheesy for me.
2007-02-19 06:47:40 · answer #1 · answered by shogun named max 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did you hear that, that's gunna really suck if they release KH3 only for the PS3 :(
It may be one of their best moves, though; putting the first two on a PS2 and the bridge on the Gameboy advance, systems most people have, they suck you in and suddenly to see the last part you gotta buy a PS3.....
The really sad thing is that the only way they could make me buy a PS3 is if they put KH3 on it, i love the games enough to waste my money like that :(
2007-02-19 14:44:52 · answer #2 · answered by stevedude256 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never played this game, but that really blows if that's true.
I'm a Wii person and I'll be one for the rest of this generation.
Heck, I've been for Nintendo since day one lol.
But yeah, they could lose money with this move, but then again, it's Sony that's losing the money ultimately.
2007-02-19 14:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If sony does that, I'm throwing out my PS2! I love kingdom hearts and if the 3rd one is on PS3 i'm gonna be pissed!
2007-02-19 17:36:02 · answer #4 · answered by David C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋