English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

see the original undertaker was not good for vince mcmahon.so he had to get someone new.thats was mark calloway.so at summerslam when it was taker vs taker that was the old undertaker vs the one today.so it really has been 2 undertakers.

with kane,even though the undertaker was playing Kane for a while it was still two kane,unless that was really the old undertaker playing kane,but the kane today is a new kane,the heads and everything else is different.

this is my last time on this topic.

2007-02-19 05:54:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

11 answers

Undertaker has always been Mark William Calaway there was a second undertaker but he was knowen Brian Lee played the 'evil' fake Undertaker at Summerslam 1994. that is the only other undertaker ever. Kane has also been the same guy to Glen Thomas Jacobs . the only other 1 of him was the imposter who came in to hype up his moive releaise date was Drew Hankinson (The Freakin' Deacon in OVW) that is the only other kane

2007-02-19 06:00:17 · answer #1 · answered by Gavin C 3 · 3 0

Your wrong, Mark Calaway has always been the Undertaker. There was a time when Mark took a hiatus and a fake Undertaker played by one of Mark's best friends Brian Lee appeared. Mark returned soon after, and defeated Brian in one of the more craptacular angles in pro wrestling history.

Glen Jecobs has suffered through a few bad angles, such as Isaac Yankem DDS and the fake Diesel. He latter got his big brake as Kane. Your confusion migh stem from the fact that Mark was originaly billed as Kane, the Undertaker, but the Big Red Machine has always been Glen. The fake Kane (which I found to be quite a good angle) was played by Drew Hankinson.

2007-02-19 06:19:25 · answer #2 · answered by no more heroes 2001 5 · 1 0

Now herers the way I see it. There has been 1 undertaker and 3 kanes. Only 1 undertaker we all know. But as for kane, theres the original kane with the mask, then the one right now on tv, cause this new kane looks bulkier, and then the imposter kane from last year. So i thinik there are 1 taker and 3 kanes.

2007-02-19 06:31:16 · answer #3 · answered by MisterMoney9 4 · 1 2

properly Kennedy and MVP are not cruserweights. And Kennedy is particularly stable as a heel. And in the initiating whilst he gave an open challenge Undertaker spoke back and then MVP needed opposition after No Mercy and he have been given it from Kane. yet ultimately i think of the WWE resourceful crew might desire to have Undertaker and Kane in extra desirable fits for the international Heavyweight call.

2016-10-02 09:48:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, nothing is really different about the Undertaker, he is just loosing hair because he is getting old. Kane doesn't wear the wig and mask any more but Kane looks better because now we can see him face expressions.

2007-02-22 14:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by Davey Boy Smith #1 Fan- VACATION 6 · 0 0

there is only one undertaker but 3 Kanes 2 masked and one non-masked

2007-02-19 08:22:51 · answer #6 · answered by TEDDY =) 2 · 1 0

No their has only been one undertaker,and one kane.

2007-02-19 09:24:47 · answer #7 · answered by Carrie G 5 · 0 0

yes, there have been two undertakers and two kanes. but the originals remain, well, the originals.

2007-02-19 06:23:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

have u noticed when kane comes back he is always shoter or talles bigger in arms and legs my cuz knows a guys that knows
this kane

2007-02-19 06:06:21 · answer #9 · answered by JennyPunk_*♥; 4 · 1 2

what the hell are you talking about

2007-02-19 06:11:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers