Why does Bush do basically nothing to stop Al Qaeda & their training camps in Pakistan. Does he think that they are no a major threat to the US? (Remember the terrorists in Pakistan were the ones responsible for 9/11 not the ones in Iraq)
2007-02-19 04:20:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bush funds Al Qaeda, trains them, and promotes their turmoil. The Bush Israel cabel were responsible for 911. Keep up with your history !
2007-02-27 04:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sense it was Bush senior who sheltered and gave safe passage to the Bin Laden family during the attacks, and shortly after, while GWB made damn sure that all of our armed fighters were over Russia at the time...and sense we now know that the tape of Bin Laden gloating was faked...I think that it is fair to say that our "The Bush Crime Family" is guilty of terrorism, and they are certainly the most prolific terrorists.
Recently the University of Michigan staged a Republican-sponsored event in which three terrorists were allowed to speak freely to the students. This event was well publicized. The only protests against this came from students. The Department of Homeland Security was not there to make arrests, protect the citizenry, or even voice an opinion.
So why are the Republicans, and the DHS, conspiring to protect terrorists in our country?
2007-02-26 16:48:18 · answer #2 · answered by Pathos 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is possible to put a ranking of importance on these dirt bags. Presently, like it or not, Iraq has become the center of our war on terror. After Iraq, who knows.
It is impossible to target a specific country to combat an ideology that is pretty evenly spread throughout the Middle East - and, unfortunately, apparently in many other parts of the world also. Afghanistan and Iraq may well be just the start if we fail to stem this demented fanaticism once and for all.
Civilized nations simply cannot allow the terror and slaughter of thousands of innocent victims to continue with impunity.
2007-02-19 12:39:31 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our military has decimated Al Qaeda and they are a fraction of what they were during the Clinton administration (when Clinton let Osama go free repeatedly).
ZERO terror attacks in America since 9/11. The record speaks for itself.
2007-02-19 12:25:38 · answer #4 · answered by x 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your question is like asking if Syphilis is more important than Gonorrhea. Both are aberrants, both describe the terrorists and both need to be treated as disgusting social diseases.
There is nothing worthy in terrorism and it should not be thought of as being even remotely honorable.
2007-02-25 16:15:16 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are the same, they travel to where ever there is fighting against the U.S. The President said we must take it to them or they will come here to fight us, I would rather keep the fighting over there. Americans should be asked that question Here or There
2007-02-26 20:15:40 · answer #6 · answered by puddog57 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Were not allowed to have troops on the ground in Pakistan.
2007-02-19 12:29:43 · answer #7 · answered by Patrick H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋