She has called for a 90 day deadline for the start of pulling troops from Iraq. Is "cut and run" going to be her campaign strategy? Won’t this put more of our troops in harms way considering the success of the current surge in Baghdad?
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2007-02-18T033144Z_01_N17363761_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-CLINTON.xml&src=rss&rpc=22
2007-02-19 03:58:11 · 10 answers · asked by Amer-I-Can 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
More doublespeak. She supported sending the troops over there when she voted for it. Now she is pandering to what is popular rather than what is right.
2007-02-19 04:01:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
it easily relies upon on in the adventure that they are Democrats at heart or Clinton supporters at heart. the actual Democrats will unite, even besides the undeniable fact that they might have widespread Clinton, Obama were given the prize. To the die-troublesome supporters of Clinton, they are going to do regardless of they could to sabotage Obama to the point that McCain would have a probability at prevailing, understanding that his 4 years would no longer be that tremendous. they trust that it will create the void in 2012 for the Democrats to present Clinton. regrettably, if Obama loses and his supporters experience that her supporter betrayed them and the get mutually, they might go back the want in 2012. regrettably, many people do no longer difficulty to look on the tremendous image. quite, they imagine of their personal objectives and needs, and to hell with some thing else. I say, vote the way you want to if you're a Clinton supporter, yet do not forget that vote casting for Obama is critically more beneficial advantageous than wearing on the failed regulations of the failed Bush administration through the paintings of John McCain. opt for properly.
2016-12-04 09:16:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton has never supported the military, she has a long history of being anti Military. Anyone that says they support the troops but not the war is trying to walk the fence. You cannot support one without the other, these young people were sent to complete a mission, and whether you agree with it or not, you should support both until the mission is complete and the troops are at home. You simply can't have it both ways.
2007-02-19 04:26:20 · answer #3 · answered by rosi l 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is offering a road map out. A phased redeployment is a way of pressing the Iraqi government to shoulder more responsibility for security.
2007-02-19 05:23:50 · answer #4 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Retreat, surrender are all the Defeatacrat/Dimwitacrat Party knows and is their PLAN for everything
Hilary will say anything the polls tell her to think as all the mindless Demoncraps do no thinking on their own
Hilary
C an't
U nderstand
N ormal
T hinking
She is
B iggoted
I gnorant
T reacherous
C orrupted
H ateful
2007-02-19 04:05:43 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, right.
Removing our troops from the midst of a civil war will put them in harms way how?
You have an interesting way of ignoring the reality in favor of your tunnel vision "solution" don't you?
2007-02-19 04:16:36 · answer #6 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When politicians fight wars, we lose. Viet Nam and Korea are prime examples.
All the gains from our victory here will be lost if we pull out now.
2007-02-19 04:11:27 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's the usual way of the democrats to lead and govern by the phony poll numbers.
2007-02-19 04:05:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Bill taught her well. Don't do or say anything without taking a poll. Don't ever go against the poll.
2007-02-19 04:09:18 · answer #9 · answered by J.R. 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Success of the surge? 90 people were killed yesterday? 60 today.
YOu cons are funny!
2007-02-19 04:02:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋