English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've been trying to get a reaction to this topic for a paper I am doing in a goverment class and no one is answering my question of 'Do you believe 9/11 was a cover up?' so I guess Im wording it wrong, so please answer this:

Do you believe that the goverment knew the terrorists attacks would happen before the happend/do you believe that the goverment is behind the terrorists attacks of 9/11. Yes/no and why not

2007-02-19 03:37:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

8 answers

No twice. These are just silly stories someone is spreading for their own entertainment. Not worth taking seriously. Its the same as the "Man didnt go to the moon" stories, "there was no holocaust" stories. If someone told you that the Hoover Dam didnt exist, would you believe them?

2007-02-19 03:50:07 · answer #1 · answered by David H 6 · 0 0

I believe the government knew there was a great chance an attack would be eminent against us and possibly against the World Trade Center.However I don't believe it is any kind of conspiracy. Remember, the trade center was attacked about 9 years earlier and Bin Ladin was proven to be behind that attempt just prior to the 911 event. I believe the government knew something was going to happen and soon but were not sure exactly when or where. In your browser type in World Trade Center/terrorism and then click on number 1 for more information regarding this subject. Good Luck on your assignment.

2007-02-22 17:37:53 · answer #2 · answered by andyt 4 · 0 0

despite the fact that I truthfully have my own conspiracy theory with reference to the assassination of JFK. And am no longer above thinking that the government does not let us know each little thing approximately an adventure.i do no longer see why this government would have any reason to do some thing as horrendous as 9/11.the straightforward certainty is we've had our head in the sand approximately terrorism because of the fact the 1970's.And the Clinton administration set us up as vulnerable in the Arab's eyes by ability of no longer retaliating for the united statesS. Cole,Hobart Towers and different terror strikes. That set the degree for what occurred to the international commerce middle.

2016-11-23 18:38:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

While I truly want to believe our government had nothing to do with this travesty, I can't help but believe that it's important for every American to stop accepting the government's word at face value. The U.S. government has been caught in too many lies over the past few decades:
a) The lie about agent orange being experimented with on our own troops in Vietnam;
b) The lie about U-2 spyplanes flying over the U.S.S.R. during Eisenhower's administration;
c) George Bush's lie about 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq;
d) The conspiracy theories surrounding the John Kennedy assassination, and how official documents won't be released until 2038;
e) Lies about 'secret' CIA prisons all over the world;
f) The Watergate scandal;
g) The mysteries surrounding events of 1947 in Roswell, NM;
h) The government's denial that a place in Nevada called Area 51 exists, when it's actually identified on government maps;
i) The mysteries surrounding Marilyn Monroe's death;
j) All the fabrications about how the Iraq war is being 'won'.

Check out loosechange.com to hear very convincing evidence about the 9-11 'terrorist attack', and how George Bush's brother 'just happened' to be in charge of security for the buildings at that time; how the building's owner bought a new insurance policy just weeks before the disaster, which specifically included being insured against terrorist attacks; how demolition experts were in the building just before the explosions; how demolition experts claim the building was laced with explosive devices which caused the building to 'pancake' as they did.
Anyone who simply accepts our government's word for this disaster, and its causes, deserves to live in bondage, held captive by a tyrannical and oppressive government. -RKO-

2007-02-19 04:39:10 · answer #4 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 0

Did they know what and where the terrorist were going to attack no.
Is there a cover up again no.
Popular Mechanic Magazine did a report in their March 2003 issue about the twin towers and how they fell and they stated that it was not an inside job like many of those who believe in a conspiracy.
If it was a cover up then by now the thousands that would have had to been involved would have started talking.

2007-02-19 04:38:43 · answer #5 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0 0

Many would want to say that it wasn't a conspiracy, but there is always a possibility. Bush had wanted to invade Iraq before and this gave him a wonderful excuse. Do you know how many people had shown up late to work that day? Plenty! And do you think that it is a coincidence that many of them worked for the government? I would like to think it was a coincidence because it is so horrible I can't even put it into words. Oh and also, I heard that Bin Laden was in some sort of training in the U.S. when he was much younger.

2007-02-22 17:57:27 · answer #6 · answered by Violet 3 · 0 0

No and no.

There's no way the government, as a body, knew the attacks were coming. it is likely anti-terrorism and foreign relation groups within the government knew an attack was in the works, but not in enough detail to pinpoint the day, location and method.

2007-02-19 03:43:08 · answer #7 · answered by symbo61 2 · 0 0

Yes because when you see gw face as he's being told what happened there is no surprise or shock he just sits there shakes his head yes and continues in the classroom I think if I were president I would excuse myself get up and leave to take care of important issues he acted as if he already knew what was going on and that it didn't bother him at all.

2007-02-19 05:03:49 · answer #8 · answered by MARY ann 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers