They should get 1 chance to make their dunk, not 2 minutes to make a joke out of the contest. I had to stop watching it when Nate Robinson was trying over and over again to make the same dunk. Didn't I see that last year? I know for sure I won't see it next year because I won't be tuning in. Thanks NBA for ruining the best part of All -Star weekend.
2007-02-19 03:06:23 · 14 answers · asked by Patrick H 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
I agree, although if you only give them one chance at a dunk, everyone will stick with something simple.
Nate Robinson shouldn't have even been in the finals, as Dwight Howard's sticker dunk was much more creative and better.
2007-02-19 03:11:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree. And thats what the NBA needs now and it would convey alot of folk decrease back to the NBA. The hype around it would be gargantuan. Minus Dwight Howard and a lil little bit of Nate Robinson, the dunk contest no longer been that exciting . listed under are the those that could definetly enter: Vince Carter Kobe Bryant Lebron James Dwight Howard Josh Smith Nate Robinson (even nonetheless i do no longer think of he might stand a raffle) Jason Richardson Andre Igudola No dunk contest could experience that.
2016-09-29 08:01:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totally agree! it wasn't even exciting anymore when nate made it...and didn't they used to have 8 dunkers? now theres just 4, who are nobodys pretty much, the contest flies by, and i feel like an idiot for staying up to watch it. And o yea, the best and most creative dunk was the sticker dunk by dwight howard, the guy put it at 12 and a half feet!!! and he gets a 42! Bull$#!+!!! Then gerald green gets a 50 on his last dunk for a windmill, this contest is done, its been done ever since vince carter won it in 2000
2007-02-19 04:02:52 · answer #3 · answered by tmapes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I somewhat agree, just having to many tries does seem a little pointless. I also don't mind because if they had this rule out when chris anderson was in the competition I would not had seen the funniest slam dunk contest ever.
2007-02-19 03:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by tasha m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man, the dunk contest is sick. I love it especially the year 2000 with Vince, McGrady and Francis.... wow.
2007-02-19 04:08:43 · answer #5 · answered by Genesis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a point. The last time there was a good all star game was in 2000.
2007-02-19 03:19:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it pointless i wish they would raise the basket to 12 ft for the slam dunk contest
2007-02-19 04:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by nas88car300 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it me or would you much rather have seen the judges competing than the actual contestants.
2007-02-19 06:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by Genesis C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was good minus nate robinson
gerald green was beasting
2007-02-19 03:54:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It should have been howard and green, that would have made for an exciting finals
2007-02-19 03:55:35 · answer #10 · answered by bosox1989 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋