or to dull sensitivity?
2007-02-19 02:46:53 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Adolescent
I would never do this to my son.
Anyone that says it does not dull sensation is full of it, and probably female. There is not good reason to do this to a baby under typical circumstances. None of the women that are all for this would think of doing the female equivalent to their daughters. They would call that mutilation. I would encourage you to leave your son as nature intended.
2007-02-19 12:20:15 · answer #1 · answered by l00k_up 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope! Did it because my sons are Jewish. And it is cleaner! They will have a great sex life Circumcised or not. The whole bad sex thing is a bunch of BS!
2007-02-19 11:53:06 · answer #2 · answered by LITTLE 1 :o) 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Boys will do it no matter what. It does not dull sensitivity.
2007-02-19 11:47:02 · answer #3 · answered by KathyS 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I didn't circumcise little Roberto so that when he's done wanking it, he has a little flap to clean it all up with!
Good thinking, eh?
2007-02-19 12:41:27 · answer #4 · answered by DeezColeslaw 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because it is cleaner and safer for the child. Reduces fungal infections, etc.
2007-02-19 13:45:17 · answer #5 · answered by country_girl 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
neither i did it so it would be easier to clean and look better when hes older.
2007-02-19 11:58:59 · answer #6 · answered by kleighs mommy 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋