No, I did NOT have my son circumcised, and was seen as quite a hippy because of it! I don't believe that for my son it was right to cut off a piece of his body for any reason, just as I wouldn't have done it to my daughter.
He is now 5 1/2, and I have never had problems keeping him clean.
As an aside, I realized that if my son really wants to be circumcised when he gets older, he can have it done - but if he really wishes that I hadn't done it... well, you get the picture.
2007-02-19 06:53:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ryann 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, I had my son circumcised for completely different reasons. First of all, most men are circumcised these days and it's rough to be the "weird one". Second, it's easier to keep himself clean. I'm pretty sure boys are going to experiment no matter if they are circumcised or not, so that's not really an issue to me.
2007-02-19 03:54:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by totspotathome 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
my boys aren't circumcised...it will only be done later on in life if a medical professional advises so...men who are not circumcised have a bad rap for being unclean..HELLO, that's because those individuals don't clean themselves right and often like they should....as a parent it's my duty to show my kids how to clean themselves properly and make sure it's a habit they keep up it....AND WANT TO DO!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-22 18:59:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by lata 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ryann, I envy your son.
The rest of the dumb b*****s that have answered these questions don't have the slightest clue the damage they have had done to their sons.
They removed 70% of the nerves that are supposed to give them intimate pleasure with their mate.
Circumcision is mutilation.
Mutilation doesn't make them cleaner.
Mutilation doesn't prevent infections.
Mutilation doesn't look better.
2007-02-19 13:28:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
circumcision is mutilation , see few videos from the web sites and decide your self.
2007-02-22 08:52:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by nvp 3
·
2⤊
0⤋