You can pick any number and work it into history, birthdates, etc. See how easily the public can be pursuaded.
2007-02-19 02:30:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
We humans have a tendency to want to quantify things in an effort to make a random universe comprehensible. This leads to the existence of "magic numbers" and the like.
It's a scary place, the universe, and we'd all like to think that there is some secret we could discover that would make it less so.
According to Douglas Adams, however, the number is not 23, but 42.
2007-02-19 02:36:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You watch way too many video clips / spend way too lots time on Wikipedia. it is in easy terms a kind and looks in basic terms as usually as the different kind. you're able to discover the kind sixty 9 everywhere in case you seem confusing sufficient, this is, as confusing as you seem for the kind 23.
2016-09-29 08:00:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
before all the hoopla about the movie, I never even thought about 23, except as a date on the calendar.
2007-02-19 02:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by wendy_da_goodlil_witch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's all hype to promote the movie which is probably really crumby and they just need a bunch of us to pay $$ so they can make more $$
2007-02-19 02:34:56 · answer #4 · answered by wanninonni 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never been too keen on numbers. But the number three is pretty neat.
2007-02-19 02:35:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this 23 thing only works in america. i appreciated the "blair witch project" marketing concept. but 23 was plain dumb, so i should get goosebumps and chills down my spine everytime i see michael jordan on media??? such a nice number and they messed with it.
2007-02-19 02:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by Tosh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its funny to watch people scare themselves silly over a number....
2007-02-19 02:54:48 · answer #7 · answered by john doe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
w/ the movie, yes...
and i agree...
23 is nt obssessed by EVERYONE i dont think!
2007-02-19 02:50:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totally agree
2007-02-19 02:34:27 · answer #9 · answered by jimmy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-02-19 03:25:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋