its already a documented fact in american history
and bush admitted to it FACT
2007-02-19 02:06:23 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because then we would have to admit Clinton Lied about it during his presidency as well
2007-02-19 02:09:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
Why do most democrats refuse to admit it was the Clinton's administration CIA reports used in large part by GW to make the final decision to go to war the Dem's thought their were WMD also.. now they want to ***** out when the going gets tough.. one other thing the Clinton administration had Binladen in their sight but was afraid to pull the trigger.. You know the rest of the story..
PS All Americans know the first year a new president is elected he spends it trying to cleanup the mess the previous president left ... If I remember correctly President Bush had just Gotten Elected... Whats up with that..
2007-02-19 02:23:45 · answer #2 · answered by ralphtheartist 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If Bush did, so did the vast majority of US Senators in office before his election, as well as his predecessor, President Clinton. That would account for 14 years of a lie, wouldn't it? Wait! There's also the affidavits of audit filed with UNSCOM, and official Iraqi governmental documents with Presidential Seals of Saddam Hussein, that repudiate your allegation. I think this means the UN lied under two Seceretary Generals, then, as well... Hmmm... We've been lied to by the world! OMG!!!!!!!1!!!!!!111!!!!!eleven!
2007-02-19 02:17:43 · answer #3 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
So then Clinto, Gore, Kerry, Putin, Blair, Annan, Saddam, and every other world leader lied as well. The reason republicans refute your claims is because we know better than to buy into your rewrite of the facts. First we know saddam had those weapons, we saw him use them against the Iranians and the Kurds. It is also a safe bet that saddam would not have allowed his country to be destroyed his government to be toppled and his own life to end unless he had something to hide. Your question should be, Why is it so important for liberals to paint Bush as a criminal inorder to make thier point
2007-02-19 02:15:16 · answer #4 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
If President Bush lied then the following people and organizations also lied.
The U.N.
France
Germany
Russia
Great Britain
Senator John Kerry
President Clinton
2007-02-19 02:12:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
Yes he admitted that there were no WMD's but what lie are you talking about. It is not a lie to repeat what you are told. He was misinformed. We will not admit to a lie as one did not happen. Find something else to bring up. This case is closed.
2007-02-19 02:20:08 · answer #6 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
President Bush acted according the the information that was supplied to him, perhaps by lib operatives...The UN was involved in the inspection, after all.
2007-02-19 02:32:52 · answer #7 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well let's see, you conveniently forgot the intelligences agency's of the French, Briton, Israel, Germany, Spain and Russian to mention a few. Get your facts straight....Or were you just trying to make a statement? Hum mm I wounder!!??
2007-02-19 02:20:29 · answer #8 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Lol.
Where is this documentation?
Bush "admitted" that he "lied"?
Please stop wasting our time with nonsense.
2007-02-19 02:09:07 · answer #9 · answered by C = JD 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
It's not a lie if you believe it. It's a delusion.
Bush had one documented unambiguous lie: Before the election, he said that Donald Rumsfeld would stay as Secretary of Defense until the end of his term. After the election, he was canned-- plans had been underway before the election-- and Bush said he kept it a secret so it wouldn't be an issue in the campaign. LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-19 02:10:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋