all of them?
2007-02-19 02:02:26 · 18 answers · asked by WMD LIEr W 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Too many....one was too many.
2007-02-19 02:05:17 · answer #1 · answered by lizzieboredom 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Add the numbers up from previous wars - the current war does not even touch the numbers. It's always a tragedy when we loose a solider, but that's the job they signed-up for. Look up the number of innocent people that die in this country every day from drunk-drivers.
What failed war? Is Saddam still in power? Have there been any more attacks on American soil? Sounds like our president & troops are doing one hell of a job!
2007-02-19 02:12:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You asked the incorrect question, judging by ability of the solutions the fifty one% who positioned elected king bush have shown up, and nevertheless denying the reality that bush lied approximately iraq having WMD's and so one. yet I provide them credit, they are incredibly sturdy at quoting the main appropriate wing bullett factors. you recognize, in case you do no longer help a mendacity president then you definately are actually not helping the troops. We have been given rid of Saddam. that would have been executed with an murderer, no longer our militia! no longer one soldier could ever die for a LIE! yet bear in concepts, if we combat the lies over there, we don't could combat them over right here. that is top, we could no longer besides, our troops our in Iraq to boot as a huge bite of our nationwide look after. For the checklist, he's not my president.
2016-11-23 18:27:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FEWEST CASUALTIES IN AMERICAN GROUND WAR HISTORY
Anyway, why would a Liberal care about troop casualties? Only 7% of the troops are Liberals. Over 60% are Republicans.
Nobody believes the crocodile tears of Liberals when it comes to the U.S. troops. You losers exposed yourselves on that one during Viet Nam. Plus, it's a voluntary army. I do believe, however, that the Draft should be reinstituted so that you Liberal bedwetters will have to sacrifice for a change rather than being armchair subversives posting from your mothers' basements all day.
2007-02-19 02:05:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I dont thin all the troops died, as we still have troops over there, and by no means is this a failed war.
glad to see where your support is though.
2007-02-19 02:09:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What people should really be looking at is how many troops
have been maimed for life. Due to improvements in body armor
many troops are surviving injuries that would have killed them in the past. Then they get to come home to a VA that is having its funding cut by the same man who sent them to be maimed.
mefeelsgreat8
I love your answer. Liberals can't tolerate anyone elses opinions except their own. Then you write what 30 sentences showing that you can't tolerate anyones opinion except yours. You really have sh*t for brains bubba boy.
2007-02-19 02:06:34 · answer #6 · answered by trichbopper 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
why does the number of deaths do not include the soldiers that were in hospitals in Germany or here in the us. just because they were not killed in Iraq does not mean they didn't die as a result of it. the real number of deaths is higher then was the press puts out. the va does have the real number and you can find it. this war wasn't a failure in terms what bush had planed happened, civil war. just hope we don't go into Iran, how many more will die?
2007-02-19 02:21:02 · answer #7 · answered by hellisawaites 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
To Many To Count
2007-02-19 02:06:31 · answer #8 · answered by mks 7-15-02 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Troops don't die for bush they die to make our country free.. The are just doing their jobs. all of them..
2007-02-19 02:07:06 · answer #9 · answered by ralphtheartist 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Not as many that have died from Dem abortions.
2007-02-19 02:09:23 · answer #10 · answered by americanmalearlington 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Way too many. Bush should be tried for War Crimes.
2007-02-19 02:06:06 · answer #11 · answered by Shmesh 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋