To no suprise, another Traitorous Democrat named Grover Cleveland refused to support pensions for Civil War Veterans. And, he lost re-election in 1888.
Do Dems hate our veterans?
2007-02-19 01:34:02 · 8 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes and serving under Bill Clinton, we in the military missed several paydays because the so called commander in chief had more important business under his desk.
2007-02-19 01:46:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Gerge Bush has just proposed cutting Veteran's Benefits by more than 28% percent in the next fiscal year and by another 10% every year after that until 2012,and this at a time when wounded vets from Iraq and Afghanistan are entering the system in the thousands,
I guess that makes him a traitorous Republican,if we follow your logic.
2007-02-19 02:48:14 · answer #2 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
properly, before everything, Iraqis have not yet: -Marched and invaded neighboring countries -Instigated genocide in those countries -Created dying camps, the place they burned/gassed/dissected/tortured/raped/m... harmless lives -Created a "Communist" government that stole from the damaging From my perspective, i've got no longer lost my guts. I basically refuse to be a area of a conquering, murdering regime Bush has set up. Our motives for entering into the two international Wars and Vietnam have been justified. countries have been invaded, lives ruined, human beings murdered. Afghanistan replaced into justified. The Taliban have been in fee of terrorist assaults. Iraq? Ties between Al-Queda and Saddam at the instant are disclaimed, information that Bush falsified terroist ties with Iraq have surfaced, they did no longer attack us first, and as evil of a dictator as Saddam might have been, he did no longer make a circulate against the US. We basically marched in there and began our very own conflict. From my perspective, it relatively is particularly like Vietnam, purely we are the invading Viet Congs. in case you opt for for me to help a conflict, you extra desirable supply me some justified motives for helping it in the 1st place.
2016-10-02 09:27:53 · answer #3 · answered by snead 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't go back that far to justify an argument. It's like saying all Republicans want to invade the South because Lincoln did or all Democrats want to end civil rights for blacks because Byrd did.
2007-02-19 01:38:35 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Pibb 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not a good idea to attack a party that doesn't really exist anymore. The democrats of today are definitely not the democrats of back then.
2007-02-19 01:37:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe you used an obscure 19th century Democrat in a feeble attempt to prove a point. How pathetic!
2007-02-19 01:36:43 · answer #6 · answered by tangerine 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No on the contrary George bUsh did not want to give combat pay to those in Iraq! And under Bush the va has 400,000 case back log!
2007-02-19 01:37:52 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And Republican ABE LINCOLN.....decided to delay the pensions!!
Makes me wonder why a Republican would delay needed pensions in the first place.
2007-02-19 01:37:43 · answer #8 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋