I personally perfer Raw, only cause it is and always has been the major brand for WWF/WWE.
I have never really taken any notice of the amount of time each match goes compaired to each brand, but i think you are right. This would be to mainly help fill in the time frame. Smackdown doesnt seem to have as many matches.
Also Smackdown seems to take the more serious edge off wrestling and can be a good laugh.
The recent PPV - No Way Out that was on today, was a Smackdown PPV and it was brilliant, some very good matches and some good laughs (little Boogieman cracks me up!)
2007-02-19 01:39:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by slarty692000 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Neither are really that great, but I prefer Smackdown! because there is less talk and more matches. Generally on a Smackdown! program you have had at least 2 matches within the first 30 minutes. On RAW the first 20 minutes is spent trash talking and then a commercial break and at about 9:30 you finally get your first match. Too much talk, too little action. Wrestling is supposed to be about matches people.
2007-02-19 11:03:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by WHEELJACK 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Smackdown is better then raw.The matches are meant to be long because it makes them more exiting and smackdown doesnt need mysterio back because we got cruserweights.Now smackdown need to start bringing in better wrestlers like they brought in mvp.Come on he sucks and they say he is the future of wrestling.Raw was losing superstars untill they hired jeff hardy and removed the great khali from ecw to bring to raw because of HHH injury.HHH should go to smackdown because this is his second time injured on raw.
Smackdown need better superstars.
2007-02-19 09:59:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by timothy 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Raw is better than smackdown because it has better tv picture and superstars. Vince could inprove it by evening out the good superstars and get rid of the superstars on smackdown ppl dont even know who they are and get better tv picture on smackdown cause it really needs it.
2007-02-19 09:51:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by TEDDY =) 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
SmackDown is fun. Now that they have Kane and it looks like the Khali is coming to SmackDown again. Kane is gonna beat his ***s. Theodore Long does a better job than Vince McMahon...
2007-02-22 21:53:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Davey Boy Smith #1 Fan- VACATION 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because RAW used to be one show. All of the original superstars except Taker and Kane wento to RAW because SD is the sister show. RAW is the main show. People need to order digital cable not basic cable to watch it because its better that's why SD is on Network TV and why Candice got fired from SD because Teddy said she was too hot for network TV and she went to RAW where people have to pay to see her in action.
Next year's Lottery Draft could make each brand better or worse,but now that ECW's in, ugh...RAW or SD is sure to get some crappy ECW wrestler.
2007-02-20 10:04:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by WizAW3S0ME 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Raw is #1. Smackdown is so boring that I haven't watched it in almost a year.
2007-02-19 11:26:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think your right smackdown is going down hill Raw is the best
2007-02-19 10:18:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by RandyOrtonfan84 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
SMack down is doing great for there terrribal roster they have very little talent exept eexept taker rey benoiit & well thstd just about it. Vince could make it better in millions of ways watch some videos of wwf in around 99 it was great/i miss it
2007-02-19 12:27:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Dadge 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on what kind of fan you are. Do you like the wrestling or do you like the storylines? It sounds to me like you like the storylines. Raw is what you should watch. Smackdown is for traditioalists, people who like wrestling, but don't like storylines taking up a lot of time on the show.
2007-02-19 09:40:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by jm42445 5
·
2⤊
0⤋